r3df0x

My brother is autistic and this is the type of autistic person who is hated by other autistic people. This is why autistic people hate mentioning it, because they get lumped in with these people.

Communism is when no iPhone.

Without communism there would be no AK.*

*It's technically an M1 Garand.

I support welfare for people who are willing to help themselves.

I'd be fine with giving free housing to people who work at least 32 hours per week, hit the gym and take care of themselves.

I've never seen a libertarian who thinks drugs and prostitution should be illegal.

It's a joke, but memes tend to be incredibly dependent on multiple layers of meta and references to other cultural events and memes.

Unless they somehow manage to lose a huge amount of context, I'm sure they'll be able to figure out what memes mean.

I find it to be a lot better since it allows multiple employees to cover many registers, but at the same time I'm very skeptical of technology that leads to less social interaction. Eventually we're going to get to a point where people will literally skip meals if it means they have to interact with someone.

There has been an increase in blatant racism and prejudice. I don't know if those users eventually get banned. If the right takes any action against blatant hate speech, shitheads like Tim Pool will start crying and denounce the platform as not allowing free speech. If they allow "free speech," then the shitheads eventually drive all the normal people off the platform. The only good thing is that Twitter already has a left wing population, so as long as they can maintain that, it should avoid turning to shit. It was also a mainstream platform so hopefully that should maintain the normie population.

Sites like Lemmy instances are better at allowing a wider range of "free speech" because as long as the instance population is large enough to keep the shitheads a minority, they can stick to their own subs and generally keep the bullshit quarantined.

Cultural conservatives (including many leftists) believe that social liberals are a danger to themselves. That's not a precedent that you want to start.

What will happen is some people will work more then that at second jobs for more money, and then that will drive down wages for everyone else.

That's only if everyone else complies.

Plenty of organizations would likely jump in. Someone could make a site alleging the bad thing that happened as the result of Google Chrome and that pretty much tanks the entire case. It would be very hard to prove reckless disregard for the truth when there's a website that alleges the claim. Furthermore, someone could simply write the code and distribute it, and every site displaying it would have grounds for displaying it.

All someone really has to do is find one thing that could potentially be a vulnerability in Google Chrome and they have grounds for making a scary notice about it.