r3df0x

joined 2 years ago
[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 3 points 2 years ago

It's mindblowing that the school admins think they can segregate boys like that and impose all sorts of nonsensical rules on them specifically and then not have severe problems. This is why we have angry, bitter incels who fall in with bigoted extremists.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not even sure how the driver would deal with that.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 1 points 2 years ago

I recently started believing in a man in the sky.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

*worshipping, technically

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 6 points 2 years ago

Online dating is incredibly superficial. It also has its own challenges and requires the right skills. Send more then "hey" but don't send a wall of text. You also want to say something that shows you read their profile without just simply regurgitating it.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 3 points 2 years ago

First of all, don't assume that these situations are directed at you. Unless it was directed at you and one of them admits it, there's nothing for the manager to go on. I know it might seem like gaslighting, but you'll be a lot better off if you assume that these things aren't related to you.

I'm sorry that this happened to you. They're ignorant shitheads who are in the wrong job. They're the ones with the problem, not you.

All the manager can do in this situation is tell the employees to be more aware of how their actions could be misinterpreted. If there's a pattern of similar complaints from multiple customers against the same employee, then they could be fired.

Dealing with this on Instagram or any website for that matter is incredibly unprofessional. This is not something that should be discussed online and businesses shouldn't expect engagement through social media platforms. If the manager wants the two of you to work it out, I could understand that, but it's a weird way of handling it.

If you think you might not keep cool, don't go in. In situations like this, if you go off on the employee, everyone is going to assume that you're the crazy one and the manager will ban you and call the police before. My wife has had this situation at work where any angry customer had a legitimate complaint and she would have been more then happy to coach the employee on how to be empathetic, but the customer ended up getting themselves banned for being verbally abusive and using obscene language. In most situations, the manager isn't going to care if the customer acts rude to them and they don't have verifiable evidence.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree that teamwork is important in a company, which is harmed by people who are continually lazy. Everyone needs to work together but at the same time, people who regularly go above and beyond need to be rewarded. There's much less envy of success when people feel like it was earned or it's something they could achieve if they worked hard. On a sports team, anyone who can't perform is let go.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If that's the case, then I agree with paying them a lot more, but making the job expectations match. If you pay a lot for an easy job with low expectations, then you'll get a lot of people who don't take the job seriously. I agree that they should be payed a lot to maintain the employment of experienced workers, but the flip side to that is the people who don't perform should be shown the door.

I completely agree that if companies give shit wages, they shouldn't expect employee retention.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru -3 points 2 years ago

There are all kinds of weird bugs that happen when I try to run certain Linux distros. There are some that will work fine, mostly, but it's not stable enough for mainstream desktop use.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 2 points 2 years ago

It depends on the internal politics and political philosophy of your world. The pseudoephedrine method would probably be effective, but it really puts a backseat to the idea of it being a fundamental right. If someone loses or can't get an ID, they are locked out. Lib left and right of the real world would be uncomfortable with such a policy for this reason.

The communist party in my world learned from their final prophet Tanisha that the Bible and Muhammad both mentioned the mark of the beast and the biblical prohibition on any business transactions for those who did not receive the mark, and they interpret this as a warning from God about capitalist or feudalist overlords who will try to separate them from God in pursuit of their own worldly agendas. They would not go for something like this.

Another solution would be to control access to the supplement, such as behind a pharmacy counter where only a few people would be able to sell it. They would be able to deny sales to anyone buying large quantities. Limiting the stores that sell it would also make it harder to go to different stores to keep buying it. That's a less intrusive method that I can think of.

Another method would be to detect the intium molecules or any molecules that it can react into.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 6 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Sometimes, they have a point that the government passed laws that disadvantaged them.

That said, fast food employees being fired over minimum wage laws could actually work out in favor of the working class. The right will be obsessed with the short term job loss, but the reduction in jobs will increase the pay of the remaining employees.

Fast food and retail should be heavily automated so that there will only be a small number of employees. The trade off will come when each of those employees is highly paid, but they also have a lot of responsibility. They'll be required to show up on time and be on call if a coworker calls out.

Fast food restaurants should be automated and have one manager there at a time to handle when things go wrong.

There are already stores that don't have any employees.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 3 points 2 years ago

Capitalists worship a bronze bull.

view more: ‹ prev next ›