quirzle

Just guessing, but either:

• I Would Kill A Mother Fucker, or

• I Wipe Koala Asshole Against Face

I'm not sure if it's the same boner...but I just clicked a 27-day old picture of one. They're doing something over there, but it's definitely not deleting all the porn.

Strange, I read for weeks how easily replaced they'd be by the thousands of willing, competent volunteers.

Desktop site enabled -> old.reddit

So...who has the deepfdeepfakes of Bernie-on-Bernie action?

14 cans a day is a massive amount, and I didn't say anything to imply otherwise.

I was agreeing with the guy I replied to that "a little poison is often fine" and elaborating that lots of things typically considered "safe" become dangerous in such large quantities.

But a little poison is often fine

Of course a little poison is often fine, if we use such a broad definition of poison.

If the definition of "poison" includes anything that can hurt you in massive quantities, that would include most drugs, plenty of vitamins, essential minerals, and even water if you take it to the extreme.

Because change? Or is there something about the font you strongly dislike?

Diet Dew instead of coke, but otherwise spot on. I've done enough stupid shit that if fake sugar is what kills me, I've still managed to deny a few odds.

I don't trust a man that doesn't have something strange going on about him, 'cause it means he's hiding it from you. If a man's wearing his pants on his head or if he says his words backwards from time to time, you know it's all laid out there for you. But if he's friendly to strangers and keeps his home spick-and-span, more often than not he's done something even his own ma couldn't forgive.

-No-bark Noonan, FNV

Fair enough; I wasn't commenting on the idea one way or another, just trying to clarify what I thought the other commenter meant.

Personally, I'm almost never in favor of a ban. I'd rather tax heavily and use the income for programs to offset. I'm 20 years removed from optimism about reducing emissions, so I think we should be leaning into technology that can actively pull stuff out of the atmosphere. That could create an incentive to move away from flying but also use the flying that's still happening to fund figuring out how to reverse the damage that's already been done.

I think the point he's making is that our second bullet of your list would make the third bullet unnecessary.