quicklime

joined 2 years ago
[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago

If anything, his incoherence is, to them, a benefit, since he's just that much easier to manipulate. Since he can't form a coherent thought on his own, he can be readily filled up with someone else's ideas, just so long as they're framed correctly.

This is pretty much what was going on in the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush too. I'm so sick of sharing a country with people who eagerly elect feeble-minded puppets... I guess because they find them relatable.

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They don't see Trump as the second coming of Christ, they see him as more like another King Cyrus. It's the idea that a ruler or other major figurehead can be a "vessel for God" benefiting the believers of a particular religion while not actually being a part of said religion or conforming to its morals.

Vox article on this, for example

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 35 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

You may have forgotten, in this party, winning is less important than pleasing the billionaires.

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

The replies make sense, and I should have realized. I guess I was thinking any deposit large enough to cover all the possibilities would be more than anyone would agree to, but I can see how it's to both owner and guest's advantage to make it work.

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (7 children)

There are hotels that allow dogs in the rooms? I don't see how that could work in the long run without requiring deposits that most people wouldn't want to pay.

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

you get half an updoot for the shittymorph reference

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago (3 children)

At first I thought it said "J.D. Vance uses interview to peg Peter Thiel to help Trump campaign with cash".

I mean, that wouldn't be terribly surprising news either.

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

That information is very widely and readily available with a basic web search. His voice was fine until (I forget) years ago when a weird illness damaged his vocal cords.

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 45 points 11 months ago (20 children)

I'm sorry I have to ask, but, serious or kidding?

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I get for vacation areas this is less of an issue but for places like ny city, San Francisco, etc it’s taking homes out of use.

It's every bit as big of an issue for vacation areas / areas where tourism is the primary driver of the economy.

Take Tahoe or Mammoth Lakes for example: until the early 2010s it was still possible to move there without knowing anyone or having any other inside track, get a job (not your favorite or first choice, usually, but something to work from while you get established) and find your crappy first apartment or half-a-cabin or rundown shack or basement or ADU to rent.

That scenario is almost completely gone now and has been for ten years, plus or minus -- depending on where each person sees the line that divides difficult from impossible. People making far less than a living wage now commute to both of those areas from an hour or more away. The sense of how "connected" or privileged one has to be to make it or even just scrape by in areas such as these has relentlessly risen to a level that has had an enormous impact on mental and emotional health and life outcomes in these areas too.

All of these factors were already big in the negative column balancing the very real positives of living so close to nature and preferred sporting activities, before the rise of the short term rental blight. But nowadays those negatives are practically off the meter.

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

holy shit. everybody should read this.

view more: ‹ prev next ›