qjkxbmwvz

joined 2 years ago
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 10 points 8 hours ago

I mean, isn't that what ringing is for---asking if they want to talk? It's ok to decline a call.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 19 hours ago

They made the decision that would save the most lives, which is their job.

But they lied to the public, which undermines trust; IMHO this was a myopic decision.

As for the people doing what's best for society, that's antithetical to American individualism

Can't speak for everyone, but Flex Alerts in California do indeed work (it's when we're asked to reduce energy consumption).

your faith was proven wrong with both masks and toilet paper being bought for resale at predatory prices, or just to maintain personal supplies at the expense of everyone else.

That's a fallacy/faulty generalization


I'm not saying everyone behaves well, but from my experience, the vast majority do. The pandemic for me was a time where I really felt like we looked out for our fellow people, at least locally.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I feel like people who don't like salads really just don't like salad dressing (and vice versa, I guess).

Smother those salads in a simple red wine vinegar and Dijon + EVOO dressing and I'd be plenty happy.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

In 2020 they recommended against face masks for non-healthcare workers. My understanding is that they did this to conserve masks for healthcare workers, as did the WHO. IMHO that was a really shitty thing for them to have done. Presenting all the facts and pleading with the public would, I think, have resulted in higher trust in them as an institution, ultimately saving lives, but that's just my opinion I guess.

But yeah, completely agree that even then it was more or less well meaning, as opposed to now.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

https://www.superbowl-ads.com/1997-tabasco-mosquito/

Best ad ever IMHO (sorry for funky link, YouTube if you prefer).

No dialog, no rampant consumerism (hot sauce is a necessary food), no sex/sexism, no emotional manipulation.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 19 points 1 day ago

Also, 1.21GW is famously used in Back to the Future.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Does you school library lend out laptops for this sort of thing? Or, can you remote into a library/lab computer for this?

I would definitely opt for a dedicated machine, running the recommended OS, no VM, as others in this thread have said. It's one thing if it's for a homelab, but for coursework...not what I'd be comfortable with.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

From link:

NOTE: The script is broken, DO NOT ATTEMPT TO USE THE SCRIPT NOW. Attempting to run it may get your account flagged stopping you from trying face verification either temporarily or permanently, forcing you to use your ID.

pr: https://github.com/xyzeva/k-id-age-verifier/pull/12

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 3 days ago

That almost makes sense, but pi radians = 180°

Right, a triangle "has 180deg," like I said.

in which case π÷n is infinitesimally small. In other words, substituting infinity for n would be incalculable

That's not how limits work. Substitution is not the same as taking the limit.

infinite and infinitesimal numbers are impossible to express rationally.

That's not true at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1/2_%2B_1/4_%2B_1/8_%2B_1/16_%2B_%E2%8B%AF

It's not about colloquialism or language

Having one word (or phrase) with two meanings is a property of language.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That's exactly my point, there are two different colloquial ways of talking about angles. I am not claiming there is a mathematical inconsistency.

Colloquially, a "triangle has 180 degrees" and a "circle has 360 degrees." Maybe that's different in different education systems, but certainly in the US that's how things are taught at the introductory level.

The sum of internal angles for a regular polygon with n sides is (n-2)×pi. In the limit of n going to infinity, a regular polygon is a circle. From above it's clear that the sum of the internal angles also goes to infinity (wheres for n=3 it's pi radians, as expected for a triangle).

There is no mystery here, I am just complaining about sloppy colloquial language that, in my opinion, doesn't foster good geometric intuition, especially as one is learning geometry.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

I don't think we're talking about the same thing.

If you take a circle to be the limit of a polygon as the number of sides goes to infinity, then you have infinite interior angles, with each angle approaching 180deg, as the edges become infinitely short and approach being parallel. The sum of the angles is infinite in this case.

If you reduce this to three sides instead of infinite, then you get a triangle with a sum of interior angles of 180deg which we know and love.

On the other hand, any closed shape (Euclidean, blah blah), from the inside, is 360deg basically by definition.

It's just a different meaning of angle.

See, for example, the internal angle sum, which is unbounded: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_polygon

 

Hi,

I am considering upgrading my router (RB750Gr3). I am eyeing the CRS309-1G-8S+IN in the hopes that the fast ISP in town eventually expand to my street (10G fiber).

My question is about L3HW offloading, and how it plays with PBR. Currently, I have a number of rules (/routing/rule), some based on source IP and some on VLAN. The purpose is to route certain traffic through VPNs (WireGuard, but I run on a separate computer, not on the router itself). Example: VLAN10 routes all traffic through main routing table, VLAN20 routes local traffic through router but sends external traffic through VPN-1, and VLAN30 sends everything through VPN-2. I use a number of different VPNs, so it's not just a binary "main route or VPN."

I am unclear how this plays with L3HW offloading. This page ( https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/ROS/pages/62390319/L3+Hardware+Offloading#L3HardwareOffloading-Inter-VLANRoutingwithUpstreamPortBehindFirewall/NAT ) mentions pbr-cap/usage/lpm-bank but I am unclear if that's referring to what I'd be using. That page also says that only the main routing table is HW offloaded in the context of VRF, so I wasn't sure if that also applied to PBR.

The question then, is, does L3HW offloading 1) Just Work for PBR /routing/rule, 2) only work via Fasttrack (perhaps requiring some redirect-to-cpu switch rules), or 3) ain't gonna work?

To preempt a few questions: I know Fasttrack is a last resort. I am a single household, I don't have concerns about TCAM exhaustion. I am considering a CRS instead of a "true" router due to cost and reduced energy footprint. I also know that I don't "need" 10G; if it is ever offered on my street it'll be via an ISP with a "best effort" policy, i.e., they don't have throttled tiers, so 10G is their only offering (cheaper than we're paying now for asymmetric cable).

Thanks!

 

What I want: I want to be able to route specific clients through different interfaces (WireGuard tunnels), and I want this behavior to persist upon disconnect/reconnect. Clients can change which tunnel, with several VLANs being able to use the tunnels (so a client A on VLAN 124 and client B on VLAN 789 can both use VPN tunnel X or Y at their discretion).

What I have: IPv4 works fine (routing rule src address -> routing table). IPv6 works, but is not persistent, as clients change their IPv6 address. (I have a dinky script where I enter IPv4 address and country, and it will grab a VPN peer from a json file, set it up, and add the IPv4+current IPv6 address to the routing rules. This works well currently; I use Mullvad.)

Any recommendations? Ideas: use IPv6 mangle based on MAC address, but I have been having trouble getting this to work (extremely slow). Another idea is to have a script run and grab the IPv6 address of client (either by hostname or by DHCP lease+MAC info), but I'm not sure if it's possible to trigger a script upon IPv6 neighbor discovery.

Any help appreciated!

 

People often complain about San Francisco's public transit


and to be sure, it's not perfect by any means (multiple separate agencies doesn't help). But the historic streetcars are pretty neat!

They're painted with the livery of various historic streetcars from all over the country (and a few international, I think). Best of all, they run alongside the modern fleet


same route, same fare.

 

Noticed a few days ago that Sutro Tower's red blinking lights are now white. Just asked them on their website form, but wondered if anyone else knows the story with this.

Personally, I miss the red ones!

6
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website to c/amateur_radio@lemmy.radio
 

Howdy!

I got my Technician in early 2000s, and last year finally upgraded to Extra. Looking to set up a very basic shack.

I'm looking for an HF setup, with most of my use probably using digital modes, but would like the ability to use voice.

Current transceiver is on loan from girlfriend's dad, a Ten-Tec Scout 555


50W HF unit with separate modules for each band. One limitation of this is that the modules set the mode, so it's LSB on 40m, making e.g. FT8 not possible (without some hacking of code or perhaps hacking the module).

Antenna is end-fed with an off-the-shelf 49:1. Currently only have 20m half-wave, but have just enough room for a 40m half-wave in the attic, which is the ultimate goal.

For digital modes, it looks like there are sort of 3 classes of radio:

  • "full digital" where the radio has e.g. a USB port and handles audio, transmit, and frequency set.
  • Some computer-control with RS232, but uses computer audio+adapter to transmit.
  • No digital, use adapter to transmit. This is what the current setup uses (and it works great!)

I'm leaning towards a conventional transceiver, e.g., something from ICOM, Kenwood, Yaesu, (or others) rather than an SDR unit. I'd like the ability to go up to 50-100W if possible.

I don't have a hard-and-fast budget; would like to keep it <$1000 if possible; mostly just looking at used transceivers. Something like a Kenwood TS-590 looks pretty amazing and very "plug-and-play" (but pushing up against price). Something like a Yaesu FT-920 looks pretty feature-rich too; and even something more affordable like an ICOM 706 or even a 725 is probably more radio than I need. Or just grab a new 7300 and call it a day!

Anyway...clearly, I don't know exactly what I want, but figured I'd ask folks with more experience if they have any wisdom. Thanks!

view more: next ›