pwnicholson

joined 2 years ago
[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think the more direct inspiration was Gus March-Phillips. The recent movie "The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare" is a fictionalized telling of the work that the team Ian Fleming was on, based of some of the recently declassified missions.

Either way, if you're interested in the topic it's a really fun movie.

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Useful Charts has some solid content. From what I've seen it's well-researched, but like anything on YouTube from a random person you should verify important facts you care about. He's good about correcting (almost always very minor) errors in follow-up videos, but the fact that he had to occasionally do those talks you something.

He's interesting to me because personally he has a Christian background but converted to Judaism, but he also does well-researched educational material as his day job, so he presents info well.

https://youtube.com/@usefulcharts

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Eh, you're probably right, but I also know a lot of people from various Houston burbs and they all lean right/MAGA, so I've got some observational bias going on too

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Houston is as well considering it's massive but full of mostly sprawled suburbs and tons of oil people or friends/relatives of oil people.

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It is in the context of a guy singing. The next line is something like "if it was a dog that had howled thus, he'd have shot him"

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"Is it not strange that sheep's guts should hail souls from mens' bodies?" -- Shakespeare, Much Ado About Nothing

(Guitar/lute strings used to be made from sheep gut, for anyone confused)

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I am one of the bosses. I've been around lots of businesses that do this kind of thing, including tiny startups.

I'm telling you for most businesses, if they've bothered to send someone on a business trip that costs $2500+ per person for an important reason, they aren't going to cancel it over $250. That's foolish.

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

The percentage doesn't change for a team vs individual. 3 people also need 3 plane tickets, 3 hotel rooms, etc.

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (10 children)

$250 is a rounding error for most international business travelers. That's the cost of one moderately nice business dinner for 3 people. Between airfare, hotels, and meals, that's less than 10% of the cost of almost all international business trips, with the possible exception of some quick jump from Toronto to Detroit for a lunch meeting.

Same for a lot of international leisure travelers.

This is a filter to keep 'the poors' away

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Comment hasn't been edited.

That's also just what I could find in 30 seconds on Zillow. Pretty sure you could get stuff even cheaper (no structures in property, for insurance) with a little effort

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I didn't say Canadian tundra, I say Canadian North.

Hers a listing in northern SK for $129k CAD that's nearly 12k acres. That's $10.75 CAD per acre. That's pretty cheap in my book.

https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1412-2nd-Ave-Edam-SK-S0M-0V0/453901932_zpid/

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Outside of the awesome 'national parks' answer from someone else, I would have to assume the best cost-to-surface-area purchase in the world would be really cheap land in the American West, Australian outback, Russian tundra, Canadian North, etc. Assuming it doesn't have oil on it, some of those areas, land practically given away. Sometimes you can get governments to pay you to take it on and try to do something useful with it.

If you consider that ownership usually includes mineral rights for miles under the ground, this really starts to look like the obvious choice of your looking for volume, not just area.

 

The expansion is based on internationally established definitions of the continental shelf, and comes from research and surveys conducted by various groups going back to 2003, confirming where the continental shelf actually is.

Interestingly, this doesn't include the water column above this territory, so it doesn't mean control of fishing or shipping lanes. Only seabed/underground mineral/drilling/pipelines control. Depending on policy and which political party is in control at the time, this could mean preventing others from drilling these areas, or (more likely?) making a profit off allowing drilling here.

Most of the addition is in the Arctic, but includes territory around the whole country.

 

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/922169

Watch this video on Streamable.

 

Either in a client (I've been using Jeroba) or in my Lemmy profile. I'd love to be able to block words I don't want to see stuff about... Like trying to avoid spoilers for movies, or just wanting to avoid mentions of certain people, but without blocking entire communities.

view more: next ›