They worked well for us, we were updating a big system or adding functionality to it and a lot of the features were similar enough that we could reliably break the work down to sub-single sprint chunks and assign consistent story points to them
Though I have only been in one team that lasted more than 3 sprints relatively intact, and it's only that team that got good at story pointing work
I try really hard when I'm in a scrum master position (my position is pretty chaotic, 20k person organisation, scaled agile, "we need your x skills this program increment, please would you?") to hide my team's individual performance from management. Mostly because your can't compare a system analysts numbers to a mainframe programmer to a mid-range programmer, but also if someone's not pulling their weight I want to solve the problem within the team where we can approach it as equals before resorting to management "performance review" systems.
I suspect the warriors were wearing armour on their torsos when they went to battle, leaving only extremities able to take damage
The idea with story points is you assign them consistently, so the team's velocity is meaningful.
One team might deliver 30 points in a sprint while another delivers 25 and they deliver the same amount of work
Of course management want to be able to use story points for tracking, they want to compare teams using them, so you end up with formulas for how many points to assign
Of course if they score you on points, they get more points, not more work and story points become useless
The estimate is not a promise, it's a guess. I prefer to estimate in sprints because that's about the resolution we can have confidence in, but management want hours so my process is to estimate the number of hours in a sprint (73.5 for us) plus one sprint
200% overruns are common, especially when requirements change significantly
I think it's their lack of free time. They have no protections if they want to take half a day off to protest.
Nothing is ever a generation's fault. There are and were good and bad among every generation. Some had luck buying into housing or business at just the right moment that value went up
Boomers, X, and older Millennials all had more luck than younger Millennials; at least the Millennials and later had recognition of autism and ADHD.
My autistic friends weren't diagnosed until their 40s, some had to work it out out on their own after the internet became popular
-- a xennial
It was a longboat, not a raft, and he had a sextant and almanac so he could look up rise and set times for stars. He lacked charts.
It was a remarkable feat
I have a friend who's sure I'm on the spectrum, and points at things I talk about as my current hyperfixation. Meanwhile I'm talking imprecisely forgetting detail.
If I'm on the spectrum, I suck at fixating on stuff
Aussie copyright law gives us the right to circumvent protections in order to make copies to watch on a device the original can't be played on.
Linux out of the box is remarkably incompatible with DRM protected content and so makes an excellent thing on which one might want to watch, listen to, or read a thing
The tricky part of lab grown meat is you need to keep it from being infected.
Keep the factory perfectly sterile.
Any time a vat is colonised by fungi or bacteria or a virus its contents would have to be dumped and the equipment sterilised
That's going to be expensive.
It will need feedstock. It will produce waste CO2
Meanwhile a cow has an immune system and eats low quality grass.
Lab meat will not be able to compete with field grown meat