Who has the time?
presoak
joined 2 weeks ago
Neither will actually seriously examine the article/video/etc.
And that's how everybody does it. We cite the term or authority and the rest is just a blurry assumption. The conversation is as deep as a rain puddle.
Yeah, validation is part of the craft.
"It" doesn't know that there are deeper etc. it's a craft. It has no brain.
It is one craft. There are others (for example, whittling). Let's not aggrandize it.
(EDIT. unified nomenclature)
Same thing in buddhism. If I quote a thing that makes no sense to me or anybody, it's legit because a famous teacher said it. But if I just freestyle my own observation, that's a no no.
That's speaking from a certain perspective on that stuff.
There's a whole world of strangeness that popular culture, science etc does not satisfyingly address. So they look elsewhere.
Sometimes you see things.
I have gone down the path of meditation an uncommon distance. Finding people to talk to about it is basically impossible. There is some common ground with consensual reality tho. And I try to do conversations there sometimes. It is generally frustrating. I should stop.
Science is just a bunch of models crafted by a society.
And there are other ways to do things.
How false are we talking? A couple seconds? Minutes?
So in summation, "nuh uh".
Well you wouldn't know what's lost until you see it yrself.
From what I've seen, it's vast. What remains is a single sunflower seed left from the whole flower.
Well that certainly does simplify it.
National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation 1989
Legend 1985 Director's Cut
Conan the Barbarian 1982