polonius-rex

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] polonius-rex@kbin.run 21 points 1 year ago (42 children)

sorry sir i don't believe i said that

i believe i said i oppose returning the land to native groups with a completely hands-off approach because it would most likely lead to a right-wing uprising within the country, which would ultimately strip said native groups of their newly held rights anyway

[โ€“] polonius-rex@kbin.run 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (94 children)

certainly sir right you are

but, just one more thing

i don't think a group of people that the state has spent centuries stamping out are in a position to successfully hold together a country as wide-spread and diverse as the united states, so i feel like just handing it over with no other intervention is as good as a free for all, and i think that just leads to a right wing takeover

[โ€“] polonius-rex@kbin.run 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (97 children)

but if the right wing took power of america's arsenal i think more Palestinians and immigrants would die

[โ€“] polonius-rex@kbin.run 63 points 1 year ago (101 children)

i don't think the left wing is best positioned to take power if there was a collapse

i think a collapse would bring the us significantly more right wing

[โ€“] polonius-rex@kbin.run 2 points 1 year ago

yesssssss, but i don't know how you'd make a legal distinction between those two

then again i'm not a law talking guy so what do i know

[โ€“] polonius-rex@kbin.run 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they did their job so well they were no longer required, i'm sure

[โ€“] polonius-rex@kbin.run 124 points 1 year ago (12 children)

how would you distinguish this from regular outsourcing

[โ€“] polonius-rex@kbin.run 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

she has baggage for the left, but that the right would probably find it very difficult to attack

"she went too hard on criminals" isn't exactly something they can use to their advantage

[โ€“] polonius-rex@kbin.run 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

people want to replace biden because they don't think he can win the election, not because they want harris as president

why would biden saying "no totally trust me guys i'll step down for harris after i've won" make him any more likely to win, especially after he already told the world he'd be a one-term president?

[โ€“] polonius-rex@kbin.run 15 points 1 year ago

i don't think players are conditioned to expect you to be their little court jesters performing for them on demand, and i think it's really weird to make the case that they do

your player probably just got into dnd through something like dimension 20, which has its sessions edited down into 1 hour slots, but relatively seamlessly so you can't tell if you're not looking for it

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ