A bit of a cynical take, but it wouldn't surprise me if ICE started throwing away shoes and phones onto the roadside.
pivot_root
One option is to use embedded structs:
type UnmarshalStruct struct {
Foo string
}
type MarshalStruct struct {
UnmarshalStruct
FieldYouDontWantUnmarshaled string
}
When marshaling, you would marshal MarshalStruct
. Because UnmarshalStruct
is embedded, json.Marshal
automatically includes all the fields from UnmarshalStruct
.
When unmarshaling, you would unmarshal UnmarshalStruct
and then create a new MarshalStruct
like this:
var unmarshaled UnmarshalStruct
err := json.Unmarshal(&unmarshaled)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
return MarshalStruct {
UnmarshalStruct: unmarshaled
}
Although, if I may ask: why do you not want a field to be unmarshaled? You could always just set it back to the zero value after unmarshaling, which is a lot easier of a solution.
At least in the US, it's full of regulatory red tape that was designed to pull up the ladder behind the current large payment processors.
Even Musk and his ample bribe money, under the most corrupt administration in decades, hasn't managed to get full approval for his "~~X~~ Twitter Money" payment service.
Even better: powerline adapters.
Or maybe a Phoronix commenter?
Are you saying you don't use The Google anymore? But how do you find all of your baking recipes?
Who's going to win?
SELinux+Seccomp+Containers...
Or the sysadmin with sudo and chmod.
Neither! It's whichever script kiddie gets lucky first.
Tea was storing its users’ sensitive information on Firebase, a Google-owned backend cloud storage and computing service.
Every time. With startups, it's always an unsecured Firebase or S3 bucket.
Of course. The surgery isn't free, you know...
I suspect he doesn't have the self-control to stop himself from reciting the rest of the Narcissist's Prayer. The big question is: which one of the usual excuses is he going to spout off to justify sexually assaulting children?
The victim-blaming DARVO classic of pedos everywhere, "they came onto him"?
Or maybe a return to religious form, saying "it's their fault for dressing provocatively"?
Although, he is known to roleplay being a businessman. Perhaps he will dig himself a nice hole and claim it was transactional, "and he paid them for their work". Then again, he's notorious for never paying his bills...
Sure, but knowing ICE took your kid doesn't really do much to help get them back.
ICE is now an extrajudicial secret police with even less oversight than the actual police. Even if someone knows ICE kidnapped their relative, nobody in the current administration is going to hold them accountable if they decide to lie and say "no we didn't". It took months to get back Abrego Garcia, and that was with the public eye on the situation and the entire Democratic Party pressuring them. For every one Abrego Garcia, there are thousands of people who are still unjustly locked up in a concentration camp.