phx

I've heard a few sketchy things in regards to his comments about his daughter, but this particular one is new to me (though not particularly surprising)

No, we mean "sharing what they claim is their experience and details of such"

Maybe they weren't sharing addresses and SSN's (though what's stopping them from doing so), but like anything online it's certainly not hard to make up, spin, or highly exaggerate a story to the detriment of the subject, but without them knowing about it.

So yeah, even if Sally Smith claims that "**Billy Jones of 125 South Street is a big loser who has undisclosed herpes, which who knows how he got it with that small dick of his", maybe the truth is that Billy refused to pay for an expensive meal on a first date it some other thing entirely.

This isn't turnabout (as the leak wasn't intentional), and not abuse either, but it may be a bit karmic.

** Names and story entirely made up for example purposes

Uh... you can't just "expose a LAN network to the Internet" in this manner. Local subnets aren't routable over the Internet, so you can't just enter 192.168.2.3 and end up on somebody else's private LAN.

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/computer-networks/non-routable-address-space/

They would have needed to either have all their internal devices being assigned public IP's or had NAT+firewall rules explicitly routing ports from their outside address(es) to the inside ones. The former is unlikely as normally ISPs don't allocate that many to a given client, or at least not by DHCP. the latter would require a specific configuration mapping the outside addresses/ports to inside devices, likely on a per device+port basis.

Either your story is missing key details or you've misunderstood/made-up something.

The storage facility concept is kinda close, if you count it as "a storage facility beside a major intersection in a big facility, with the locker doors left open despite meant the warning at the front desk not to do so"

So how about when a link is shared on Lemmy or Reddit or FB? Do the latter strip out the identifiers, or does that one person's reshared post associate them with the clicks of thousands of others?

For web links, they'd also be able to find the source from the referrer tags etc

EXACTLY. You don't need to "trust", you can look at the comments that were consistently made in regards to women, the vile behavior he engaged in, the known relationships, and the week court cases, i.e the evidence that was there in plain sight but people chose to ignore

I get connection refused on that one

Or he turned on them and this is basically the leash they held in reserve...

Because they couldn't, or at least not without potentially ruining the case while it was before the courts at the time?

Did you even watch the video

Did you even read the comment? I said "in front of" (as in perpendicular to) not "into".

That is EXACTLY what this car was trying to do. Take a second to read things properly before you comment maybe.

Stopping might have still been a better result than turning in front of incoming traffic though

The funny thing is, AI and blockchain likely could augment a lot of stuff in his ways, but the higher-ups don't understand the technology or their own product enough to pursue though.

Especially AI as they see it as a way to replace people or existing stacks/products instead of using it as an assistive technology to improve them