pglpm

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Now I understand. Kubuntu instead makes modifications to the Ubuntu core. Although Neon must be somehow removing Gnome, I imagine.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Good to know, cheers.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Thank you, very helpful! May I ask what you use now? Do you know if they add their software via snaps or flatpaks?

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Very helpful, thank you so much!

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (11 children)

PS: they say "most other software is not supported". Have you ever had any problem installing other programs? As examples, I'd prefer using Firefox to Konqueror, and other programs to KDE connect.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Thank you for explaninig what they mean by "base"! But then what's the difference with Kubuntu? In the FAQ they say "as there is vast overlap in the base offerings of both Kubuntu and KDE neon", but what do they mean with "base offerings"?

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Thank you. By "KDE version" you mean Kubuntu? or am I misreading you?

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

OK I'm confused. They say it isn't "quite" a distro. So what's missing to make it a distro without the "quite"?

Thank you for sharing your experience! I love KDE's customizability and that's why I'm interested in KDE Neon too.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thank you, I see, it isn't just a check as I understood. Then the meaning does make sense.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I suspected that, happened to me too, when some Lemmy instances were overloaded. No biggie: if the two comments from the other duplicate are reposted here, I'll delete that one; otherwise we leave it there.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The Oxford English dictionary also gives one definition of less as fewer, but with a warning:

A.1.c A smaller number of; fewer. This originates from the OE. construction of lǽs adv. (quasi-n.) with a partitive genitive. Freq. found but generally regarded as incorrect.

Gilman's Webster's Dictionary of English Usage gives an insightful and (as usual) witty discussion. I paste it here as an image:

Gilman's discussion about "fewer/less"

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

According to the Cambridge dictionary and to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, "assert" means "to say that something is certainly true". The Oxford dictionary gives a similar definition among others:

III. To declare, state.

7 trans. To declare formally and distinctly, to state positively, aver, affirm.

So to me it sounds strange to use it as "to check". I haven't seen a definition similar to "to check" in the three dictionaries above. I didn't know it was used this way in programming.

Edit: my understanding of the programming term was wrong, see other comments.

view more: ‹ prev next ›