pg_jglr

joined 2 years ago
[–] pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

The planet money podcast has had several episodes where this has come up. I think the last one about the resistance to free filing tools is a good one

[–] pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't forget about cheap labor over there, economies of scale with the large Chinese market, and with a very different regulatory environment. The American auto industry has an uphill battle ahead of them.

Not to excuse the lack of innovation here, I personally blame the trend of wealth extraction for executive pay and shareholder returns at the expense of long term thinking and reduced R&D spending.

[–] pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This was the part that I wouldn't do just because I view the sink as mostly clean and plunger as mostly dirty. So unless I were to sterilize the sink afterwards I wouldn't put a plunger in the sink.

[–] pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 months ago

Because not only did he not make the above distinction, the comments try to devalue anyone with that diagnosis.

[–] pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Very cool, but I suspect that participants will be giving up something when it's implemented. I would be curious if the user can override the load sharing when the car is needed. Would be rather annoying to go get your car and find it at half charge.

[–] pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Go protestors, remember that you have the support of many many more than can be there!

[–] pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

I didn't get through it. I agree with your comment about the characters not resonating. I got about a third of the way in and just decided to go on to the next book in my pile.

[–] pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You are right of course, but that's part of the joke. I think it's provokes such a viseral response because it's directly "against" the reader, not many of us can claim to be directly impacted by genocide for example, even though it's way worse.

[–] pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

There are some good points in the article and I think some poor comparisons. I have seen examples of what they mention. NASA is still demanding things from companies like a cost plus contract but paying them like a firm fixed price contract. This basically means that the only companies that will succeed in the long run are those that have billionaire funding instead of shareholders. Assuming SpaceX doesn't have cost overruns is just silly, it's just that NASA doesn't see them.

[–] pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 months ago

This aligns with what I have heard from folks I know in that world. Fear motivated by exaggerating one off and isolated incidents. The information silos in the conservative world (especially news) is frightening.

[–] pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

At this point I am no longer surprised just wanting to know what the consequences are.

[–] pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works 39 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Odd implementation of ranked choice. Probably too many choices without party affiliation listed for voters that didn't come into the booth having already researched the choices. Sad because this will probably get used to say the whole concept is bad.

view more: next ›