peregrin5

The fact that someone supports Israel in this conflict is likely what you'll use as evidence that someone has "strong ties to Israel".

Most claims of genocide come from people who have strong ties to Palestine or people linked to Palestine. Why does the same bar of evidence not apply to you?

https://time.com/6334409/is-whats-happening-gaza-genocide-experts/

There are several people referenced in this article not Israeli or tied to Israel that claim Israel's actions don't meet the criteria of genocide. As I recall your request was that I provide just one. Now I'll wait as you claim that these experts are actually just Israel shills and they should thus be disregarded.

You stated that "EVERY reputable expert" says Israel is committing genocide literally using a source that was TITLED "experts deeply divided on whether or not Israel is committing genocide".

Then you said that you would only accept experts as "reputable" if they didn't support Israel in the conflict. Lol.

I deny a genocide when there literally isn't a genocide bruh. Using it for every conflict waters down the term to basically mean nothing.

I couldn't respond to you anyway (not that I was going to) since I got banned for breaking the cardinal lemmy rule that you have to hate Jews to post here.

Mhm. Sure. Lol.

Hard leftist who makes unsupported claims and moves goal posts when they're proven wrong? Even if they aren't literally a communist the venn diagram overlap is pretty damning.

And now he's obsessively stalking me.

Lmao tankies following me around now. Sorry that you didn't like that I refused to put up with your BS goal-post moving after your argument was shot down. Not my problem though.