If this were true it would have been released under Biden.
I still think they should be released, and that the Dems are correct to push for it now. But if we find out Biden or Garland was covering up for the Clintons they all should be fully persecuted too.
Seems like a trend among Microsoft-owned studios. Like last year when they decided to close Tango Gameworks shortly after they made Hi-Fi Rush... Which was another game they released with very little marketing or pre-release hype and still managed to be successful in spite of that.
It's almost like Microsoft WANTS their studios to fail.
From the comments, it appears as though OP may have originally posted a picture with Linda Lovelace, then changed it to Lisa Ann after reading this comment.
I'm not sure what you are saying here?
Are you saying that Valve and Itch did not respond to Collective Shout? Well, so did I... My comment was saying they were justified in doing so.
Are you saying Collective Shout are not religious nutjobs? That's an easy mistake to make because their website and branding does a really good job of trying to hide it from a casual researcher, but the founder Melissa Reist is pretty obviously a devout Catholic- she gives interviews with Catholic organizations, appears at Catholic youth camps, and describes herself as a "pro-life feminist", which is of course an oxymoron. She's definitely a religious nutjob.
Yeah Louis's situation seems pretty unique. Not on the same level as someone like Epstein or Weinstein. He didn't do anything with his own employees or underaged fans. Sarah Silverman has been a big supporter of him and confirmed that he was always like that going back to when there was not a power disparity in their early club days together. His apology statement is one of the best I've ever seen.
But... There's still some red flags, including some in just discovering as I am refreshing myself on the details now. If the 5 accusers, it looks like the first 2 were from an incident in 2002 at a festival where they escalated to to event organizers... And nothing happened. Then Rebecca Corry in 2005 on a TV show set who declined and reported the incident... And nothing happened. I can't find when the other incidents happened, but like... Surely after these first 2 cases someone would have communicated to Louis how this was bad, right?
And Dave Becky, Louis's manager at the time, sent letters to the victims threatening them to try to silence them. He later apologized and dropped Louis as a client, and Louis later publicly supported Becky and apologized to him as well. I'm not sure what to make of the whole mess, but if Becky was threatening victims that kinda feels like it should be worth some jail time, and if Louis ordered him to do so... Yikes.
Also I don't think there's an objective answer as to whether he should have retired, or how long he should have stayed out of the spotlight before returning. If I were him I probably would have just retired, but at the very least I would have spent a few years out of the spotlight. The initial article with the accusations came out in November 2017, and his next public appearance was August 2018, not even a whole year. And there was no easing in with less controversial material - he jumped into School shootings. He has since released a special called "Sorry" where he didn't apologize but instead kept getting more controversial and used the F slur.
He's also very good friends with Dave Chappelle, a certified piece of shit, and Jerry Seinfeld, famous for dating 17 year-old high school girls. And I get it- he got his break early on by opening for Seinfeld, but ya know maybe just tone down how public that friendship is given the circumstances?
I don't feel the need to break out the torches and pitchforks for Louis, or pretend like none of his earlier works ever existed, but i'm also not in some huge hurry to defend him and restore his career either.
As they should have. Why should Steam or Itch.Io have to respond to every tiny cult of religious nutjibs making ridiculous requests?
I know Luis CK has gotten a bit problematic for other reasons, but I always liked his take on this in particular.
Apologies as I couldn't find an original video, just this weird channel animating the original audio. But every time my wife and I are in a car and see someone cross multiple lanes to get to an exit they almost missed we look at each other and say "but that's their FAVORITE way!"
You aren't wrong, but I think it's also important to account for the role of right-wing leaders in attracting these people to their side.
The likes of Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes have done devastating damage to the US, UK, Australia, and more. They portray military service and patriotism as manly and good. They portray poverty as a personal moral failing. They portray progressive cities as anarchist hellscapes and rural towns as idyllic.
Okay your first two paragraphs are just ad hominen attacks at this point. You aren't refuting anything by just claiming I'm backpedalling on... Something? And just assuming the other people didn't read the article when in fact it seems they did and are also making great points that you're also just refusing to talk about. Like... Why did you even post this if you didn't want to actually talk about points, methodology, potential explanations, etc?
Xbox is just plain doing badly. They've tried a lot of different approaches to change that over the years: leaning hard into alternative control schemes with Kinect, trying to push Xbox as a general multimedia machine rather than just a videogame console, pushing hard to develop small indie studios, then pushing for mega-acquisitions of publishers and developers. I'm not even sure which "old model" you're talking about because they are constantly, desperately pivoting to something else. They seem to be terrible at predictjng what consumers want or how markets will react to their decisions. So I'm still waiting for you to explain why copying them is a good idea. As I said earlier: they have always had less focus on exclusivity because their hardware sells at a loss, and they haven't changed that.
Nintendo is coming off the 3rd best-selling console of all time, the best-selling console in 2 decades. The Switch 2 not only had the best 1st week on history, but the best 1st month too. I suppose it is still early and totally fair if you want to wait for the first full year to make a judgement, but it seems to me like Nintendo produce a unique and innovative product that people want back in 2017 and are continuing that success now. That product is in a very different market than the Xbox, and uses a very different business model where the hardware itself is profitable. They're the only one of the 3 that hasn't shut down studios or laid off employees lately. So, once again, the idea that thinks he knows better than them seems pretty far-fetched right now.
There's something else that's been bothering me...
He's done this job for a long time, and people trust and respect his work
I've been following the videogame industry for decades and I've never heard of this guy. Which is not all that outlandish on its own. But I also have never heard of The Game Business- it seems like a new website just created this year. And you seem to be incredibly defensive of this guy- completely ignoring any discussion of the industry and binging your entire argument here on his credibility. Are you Mat Piscatella himself on a burner account?
I didn't backpedal on anything at all so I'm not sure why you think that. My initial statement was that he did not provide enough data to reach his conclusion and seems to be drastically oversimplifying the problem to reach his conclusion, by focusing on the unit sales of singular pieces of software in a vacuum and assuming that games are fungible. I pointed out how different videogame companies operate with different business models that are more or less condusive to exclusive 1st party titles. None of that has changed, and the only thing you've said to try to dispute any of it is "this consultant said in an interview that he thinks exclusives are bad". No attempt at discerning causation or explaining it, no attempt at even refuting the arguments I present, just "you should trust this guy, who also happens to be selling a product". If I wasn't bored killing time at work I wouldn't even bother responding because this isn't really a conversation, you just keep going "nu uh".
Not just me: You've spent this whole thread arguing with myself and everyone else who are pointing out the obvious and glaring holes in what he's saying.
One of my favorites is this one. Xbox has failed to make a profit throughout the entire history of the company. They've spent the last few years shutting down studios and laying people off, which has led to a lot of industry speculation. Insiders have reported rumors that Spencer might get pushed to resign or even fired. There's been speculation that Xbox might be considering exiting the hardware side of things entirely, in part because of their own marketing campaigns. I am not saying I believe that, but these are strong signs that Xbox is doing badly.
Nintendo, by contrast, just had the single best launch week 1 in the history of videogame consoles. Pretty much every way you look at the Switch 2 sales numbers they are breaking records. And this guy saying that Nintendo should copy what Xbox is doing. That is an extraordinary claim which requires extraordinary evidence for me to take seriously.
And while anecdotes are pretty useless, I agree with you that many publishers have trended towards multiplatform releases and I said that earlier. I'm not disputing that: I'm disputing his comments about 1st party publishers.
https://www.forbes.com/real-time-billionaires/#517324be3d78
Just within the top-25 I see Jensen Huang, Mukesh Ambani, Carlos Slim, Changpeng Zhao, Zhong Shanshan.
White people are over-represented in the list, but there's plenty of non-white billionaires that are just as problematic as their white counterparts. The vast, vast majority of white people are not billionaires. Racial division is a distraction that serves the billionaires.