osarusan

joined 2 years ago
[–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

My god, dude. I told you that I am not fucking interested in engaging with you and you just. will. not. stop. I'm not going to suddenly start engaging with you now that you pretend to want to actually have a discussion. That ship sailed several comments ago.

When someone repeatedly tells you they're not interested in talking to you, and you keep trying to start an argument, you are a troll. You want to argue so fucking bad that you just can't stop trying. You are a fucking troll.

Go start your argument with someone who gives a shit.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

When someone repeatedly tells you they're not interested in talking to you, and you keep trying to start an argument, you are a troll.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

I keep telling you I'm not interested in having this conversation with you, and you keep replying and trying to pick a fight.

That's how everyone reading this knows you're a troll.

When someone repeatedly tells you they're not interested in talking to you, and you keep trying to start an argument, you are a troll.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)
[–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Keep on going like I didn't twice already say I'm not interested in engaging in trollish pedantry.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (10 children)

I made no argument. There's nothing to source.

You're trying to start a kindergarten-level fight and I'm not interested in engaging in that kind of behavior. I'm here for discussion, not pedantry.

Go waste someone else's time with your trolling.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (12 children)

Jesus Christ what a level of pedantry is this... I'm not engaging with this kind of bullshit, so go ahead and regard it as "a failure on my side."

Fucking trolls wasting everyone's time and poisoning every discussion...

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (14 children)

What source are you looking for? That comfort women refers to women forced into sexual slavery for the Japanese military during the first half of the 20th century? That's just the definition of the word. I'm not sure what you're asking for.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Sex workers are not comfort women. What's the confusion?

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Sure, as long as you're not concerned about using 4 words where 2 will do.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (41 children)

Here in Japan, the term comfort women is used for the exact same reason it is used in English and around the world: it clearly and unequivocally describes the people being it is used to describe.

It's not a weasel word used to avoid talking about the truth. It's just the word that people use to talk about a specific group of victims. It's a useful term that quickly gets us to the core issue, rather than starting at an extremely vague term and requiring clarifying language every time we talk about it. It's just basic communication.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

I literally explained how using your term actually obfuscates the facts more than using the term comfort women. Also, the article describes what the term means, so the claim that obfuscation is going on is really bizarre.

view more: ‹ prev next ›