osarusan

Are they too dangerous for an unlicensed individual to own? Yeah

Congratulations. You figured out my point in your first paragraph.

Purchase or possess

So....... own.

And if you don't have a license, you are not allowed to ___ it?

Snopes' take on this is really weird. They seem to be bending over backwards to invent an alternative narrative for him for some reason.

Listening to the videos, it sounds pretty clear to me that Trump did in fact say "we've been waging an all-out a war on American democracy." Not in. _In _doesn't even make any sense in the context. You wage war _in _a place, like Ukraine or Palestine. You wage war _on _a concept, like terror or democracy.

That said, I can definitely give him a pass that he didn't mean what he said. I can believe that it was very much a gaffe, because he is such a goddamned moron who rambles on without thinking. It sounds to me like he wanted to express that he is fighting in a war that his opponents are waging on American democracy, and he just said it wrong because he's a fucking idiot. It seems obvious that's what he meant to say, and he just said it wrong.

Which is what makes this snopes article so weird... why call the claim false and then defend him in this way? Why not rate this as mixture? Oh well...

Saying something is too dangerous to own is fucking stupid

they’re are reasonable licensing and registration requirements.

Don't you think the reason there are licensing and registration requirements for dynamite is because it's too dangerous to own?

Spoken like somebody who is cluelessly buttering their face in front of the leopard cages.

The leopards are going to have their bellies full of face meat this election season...

I mean that's basically a rule that says they can't associate with other GOP members, so it's not surprising they'd reject it.

Practice.

I mean, if you inherit a billion dollars, that's more money than you will ever earn in several lifetimes of actual work... so yeah.

I'm guessing either 1) it's one more thing for conservative assholes to judge her for, or 2) they think a woman's identity is tied to her ability to breed, so once she has kids she is no longer a "woman" and become a "mom."

I feel like most things conservatives want can easily be explained by their consistent desire to harm women.