oo1

joined 2 years ago
[–] oo1@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

live to work,
why e/se

[–] oo1@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] oo1@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] oo1@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

yeah, I don't want to fill my steamdeck with 4k res assets.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Drop down, increase speed, reverse direction!
That whole what-if felt like a whole episode of jokes in 1/3rd of the time.

Also the finglonger from the first anthology of interest .

[–] oo1@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

. . . or any other brownian motion generator

but if drinks are allowed i'll go pan-galactic gargle blaster.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

demolition man is exactly correctly rated by me.
but imdb underrates it .

[–] oo1@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

The format doesn't bother me too much.
json can be great for sure.

But I reckon some people could still bung a load of unnecessarily complex layout and aesthetic data in there, and potentially screw up the data structure and still make it harder to access than need be.

I accept that, if the json is structured logically, it should handle both substantive and layout data, and probably easiest to get to either the content or the formatting.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

holy f.

what a buch of ner. . . i mean . . .rogues.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

I think he skips track 2 though

[–] oo1@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

what is that headline typeface, and is there anything i can do to un-see it?

i think john maynard keynes wrote something about it being ok to have a few serifs on a steady stream of glyphs, but it becomes problematic when the glyphs are but bubbles on a whirpool of serifs

[–] oo1@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

yeah, substance > style.

the content/facts/information is what should matter, make it accessible. share it.

let the audience access it however best suits them.

view more: ‹ prev next ›