oo1

joined 2 years ago
[–] oo1@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

yeah all I thought maybe people with a catheter.
Or they're fish or something.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

sudo mkdir /dev/heaven
sudo mkdir /dev/earth
sudo chmod o+rx /dev/earth
sudo systemctl start light.service

(/s, just trying to troll some systemd haters)

[–] oo1@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

upvote for yes, downvote for no.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago
[–] oo1@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago

real bullets. . .
playing . . .

That's fucked up.
I find it very hard to understand the attitudes some people have towards firearms.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Merry also means drunk - at least in common British English.
Therefore it is quite an easy state to attain either from the offy, or a few pubs tat are also open for a few hours in the afternoon.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago

new fork of legacyOS into LandfillOS.
based on "De Bin"
The only major change needs to be you save stuff by putting it into the wastebasket.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Is it? you're probably talking 4th or 5th dose at this point. Are many countries really still doing comprehensive booster programmes for all ages?

In my country - for this flu season - the only under 65s who get a booster covid vaccination are those with specific health issues or care workers.

Even looking at a country like Germany that typically have much better health service, it looks like they're limiting the additional annual boosters to mostly over 60s plus special cases at younger ages.

I'd be more worried abut the low uptake in the elderly groups - did they get no booster at all, or did they just not get the xbb 1.5 specifically?
I think there was a bit of a rush and supply chain issues in September with the new variant.

We're at about 68% for over-65s this season as a point of comparison - so that looks way higher than canadian old people as reported in that article.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

hah, no bother.
Take any excuse to vent.

Fortunately for me I don't live in USA so these things are still a bit of a rarity, and are quite impractical in my town's, compact and heavily pedestrianised town centre.

Sounds like yoy've a plague of them over there.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago

IP infringement law suits.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

More boringly , maybe its selection on the circumstances too. For example maybe ev's tend to drive more in urban environments, more urban may mean more collision opprtunities per time spent driving.

Of course ram is a farmers vehicle is desgned for rural use, so must rarely be seen in built up areas. /s

edit: having glanced at the cited article - theres no obvious mention of any risk adjustment, the measures seem to be simple ratio of crashes per driver. No obvious control for whether the sub-population spend more or less time driving.
Rate per - place-specific-risk adjusted person-hour would work better.

As often with things like risk, it really helps to be able to do a multidimensional analysis. See if vehicle type/brand is significant after controlling for as many circumstantial factors and exposure related factors as you can reliably observe.

view more: ‹ prev next ›