They even did the same in Aus
Second person I've had to say this to- this isn't reddit, you clearly need to read the article as you're spreading misinformation
The intended effect was to create a revenue stream for traditional media players, so saying "our way or we're out" is, in fact, an attempt to coerce the outcome they want.
tbh I'm kind of hoping fb and google stick to their guns if only so that it solidifies their reputation as a source only for misinformation.
This isn't reddit, did you even glance at the article? Your entire comment is misinformation lol
tbh I've found the opposite approach to be a lot more successful- the base weapon doesn't matter as much as the monster parts I use. Once you start getting a couple of silver bokoblin horns to fuse with, the weapons system "experience", so to speak, improved a ton. The higher-level monsters become a bit easier to tackle, so it becomes a positive feedback loop after that for better monster parts.
Some of us are queer AND ND, you know... in fact, most queer people I know are ND in one form or another. An anecdote isn't data of course, but have you ever checked out, say for example, the prevalence of autism among trans people? These experiences aren't necessarily mutually exclusive.
Your experience is valid, and you're not wrong at all to feel that advocacy within the realm of mental health has so much catching up to do. That being said, everything you wrote kind of contradicts your first statement. Your own outlook is an "us vs them" conceptualization, I do hope you recognize that (it seems you do) and are working towards breaking out of that. I get it's not easy to be vulnerable in this way and discuss how you feel in this regard, and you do make some very valid points when it comes to perpetuating harm through outdated methodologies and such, but it really is another discussion entirely.
These aren't vague points at all. I mean, it's understandable if you aren't aware of the elevated suicide rates among trans people and the impact of gender affirmation in suicide prevention in that regard, the body of literature supporting that isn't all that accessible to lay people, but surely you're not ignorant to the fact that someone else brought up in this very thread, that parents can abuse kids for being trans (or just queer in general), and if someone doesn't feel safe being out at home, there's usually a reason... right?
No one is saying that trans kids should take priority over other kids who are "getting bullied", that's missing the point by a wide mark. Maybe you didn't intend it, but you're sealioning here, the answers you're asking for are already available to you in this very discussion. Creating a safe environment for kids isn't some zero sum game. Advocating for trans students isn't about making them a "higher priority" over other kids. Frankly, approaching issues like that is what creates division, not advocacy and acceptance.
You're missing the point by focusing on function of the players involved. Policies that protect trans students are ultimately rooted in risk assessment. There are risks to personal safety if someone is outed facing an unsafe environment at home. And to wellbeing and, ultimately, personal safety again if someone is forced to live as a gender they don't identify with. These risks, on both sides, are drastically reduced by offering a safe space and support in being who you are. The delineation of responsibility between parents and schools in preparing kids for their lives is separate from how to best offer support for the safety and well being of queer kids.
I mean, if we're bringing up specific examples of targeted groups, it's a demonstrable fact that yes, the queer community in Germany was targeted in the very very early years of Nazi rule. Yes, Aktion T4 was horrifying, but as you mention there are so many groups they targeted, saying "what about these people?" only serves to distract from specific echos of history people should be calling out today.
The Lufa model needs to spread across the country
I love Bunz so, so much (although I really do wish they would abandon the Bunz affiliation and become a PALZ group, Bunz as an organization has been very exploitative of its community in Toronto in the past after VC-funded expansions involving an official app- sound familiar? Aaaanyways...) but I think one drawback of establishing trade spaces here is the relative anonymity. People can still be anonymous on fb, of course, but I can see common friends, past posts and comments in groups I'm in with them, etc. Plus, you can't really msg with a PM here, can you? I wouldn't be comfortable giving out contact info to arrange a trade, nor would I be comfortable coordinating trades publicly in a thread. I think if there's a way to account for safety concerns, maybe, it could work.
Facebook hasn't "literally [backed out] of Australia", the article covers that. You may not appreciate the condescension but I mean, you're doubling down now on a false premise and refusing to acknowledge the actual specifics of the situation, I'm not sure what you expect when you're seemingly knowingly spreading misinformation.