nymnympseudonym

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Maine is civilized. They have legal weed.

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

All depends on your threat model. If a major government is after you, you're screwed no matter what.

Otherwise, making a .onion for your website is straightforward.

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You sound transactional. Maybe you'll be President

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world -4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (4 children)

I am getting downvoted to hell and shouldn't give these people the pleasure of knowing this but...

I have multiple times missed time with my wife and children because I wanted to get an important job filled by someone I was excited to hire. Who ghosted me.

And I am saying, people who casually waste other's time and goodwill, should have a reputation that catches up with them, sooner rather than later, for the good of all.

What the fuck is wrong with people that I am the bad guy here, seriously

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world -1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I'm curious when you and I because such horrible people. Acting like we deserve basic courtesies auch as being told if someone is no longer interested, so we can get the job filled

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

"Not interested, thank you"

Vs

(Ghost ... tumbleweed... how long you gonna wait?)

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago

Hey! I saw this movie! El Presidente is even rapey on younger blondes

https://woodyallen.com/bananas/

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well, maybe you aren't aware of how it's being used to design proteins to create therapies for pretty much... everything, from cancer to Crohn's. Another 2-3 years before you see products in human trials.

Or how it's revolutionized climate science and weather forecasting.

If all you see is the hype Grok images and SEO slop, it's reasonable to reject the technology. But that would be deeply misguided.

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I am optimistic. I will get downvoted to oblivion, but I want to share what I honestly observe:

1. AI demand is driving huge investment in production of carbon-free energy at scale.

Yes, AI is sucking up all the immediate term cheap fossil-fuel energy while it can. But it needs more, so it's driving carbon-free investment.

Immediate term with Small Modular fission Reactors (SMRs)

... and immediate term, multiple commercial fusion energy plants are being built.

2. Commercially viable carbon-free energy at scale is coming online in < 10 years

SMR is real, exists today, and just needs economies of scale ... and stable regulation. AI datacenters are driving the orders now and even if MAGA cultists keep USA out a few more years, science-accepting countries will be investing in clusters of those, rather than coal plants, when they see working examples and so less risk.

The Fusion plants this decade will not be just prototypes, but plants that produce more energy as a whole than they take in, multiple times over, and ofc don't produce nuclear waste. This is largely made possible by high temperature superconductors (which didn't exist commercially when ITER was built) and a demo plant fully online in 2027

EDIT: ofc we should reduce excess CO2 emissions immediate term, don't misconstrue long term optimism for polyannish denial of imemdiate term emergency

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

I am not a linguist but the deafening silence from Chomsky and his defenders really does demand being called out.

Syntactical models of language have been completely crushed by statistics-at-scale via neural nets. But linguists have not rejected the broken model.

The same thing happened with protein folding -- researchers who spent the last 25 years building complex quantum mechanical/electrostatic models of protein structure suddenly saw AlphaFold completely crush prior methods. The difference is, bioinformatics researchers have already done a complete about-face and are taking the new AI tools and running with them.

[–] nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

believing that a large language model has any kind of awareness or actual intelligence is absurd

I (as a person who works professionally in the area and tries to keep up with the current academic publications) happen to agree with you. But my credences are somewhat reduced after considering the points Hinton raises.

I think it is worth considering that there are a handful of academically active models of consciousness; some well-respected ones like the CTM are not at all inconsistent with Hinton's statements

150
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
 

In the 2020 Good Morning America interview, the Osbourne family disclosed Ozzy Osbourne’s condition. He had volunteered to have his genome sequenced in 2010 to see if his DNA could offer more clues about his health.

 

Hinton (Nobel Prize winner, "Godfather of AI", key contributor to training functions) recently gave a talk at the UK Royal Institute.

Possibly the most controversial and interesting assertion he makes is that, by his analysis, current multimodel LLMs do in fact have subjective experience -- and this may be a separable idea from the idea of "consciousness", ie, LLMs have a subjective experience, but not consciousness.

(hopefully the link goes to 36:33, where he talks about this)

 

Detailed journalism. Irrational dangerous people.

view more: next ›