null

joined 2 years ago
[–] null@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 month ago

You might consider updating the title to reflect that.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago
[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Do you think I'm offended by it?

[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What a weird reply...

Do you think I'm angry?

[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

This is the same "argument" that says "literally" can mean "figuratively".

Not a particularly interesting argument to point put that common misusage can alter meaning.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

What "experts" argue about that?

[–] null@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago

So what word would you prefer for someone who intentionally provides a large platform for fascists to spout their rhetoric and misinformation, thus helping them gain power?

[–] null@slrpnk.net 19 points 2 months ago

Not if the point is to make the government acknowledge their gender.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago

How would you quantify that?

[–] null@slrpnk.net -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

of what's going on

Which, for perspective, what's "going on" in this context is one comment that you've decided twist and laserfocus on so you can grandstand.

I beg you, re-read the thread and see where you got lost.

view more: ‹ prev next ›