"With Gore instead of Bush, there would have been no Iraq War, for one thing"
this can't be proven, either
"With Gore instead of Bush, there would have been no Iraq War, for one thing"
this can't be proven, either
"If everybody who voted Nader had voted for Gore instead, there would have been no wiggle room for the Supreme Court to butt in."
this can't be proven
the democrats or the republicans?
you can't know what would happen in a world where there were never guns. I'm not asking for anything. I'm pointing out we can't possibly know what such a world would look like
gore won that election. the supreme Court stole it.
since you can't prove a counterfactual, we will never know
oof. one week old account shilling for israel
one week old account shilling for a political party
where is the full paper?
your semantics are dull
you don't need to accept either claim. you can suspend judgement.
try reading into epistemology
" And every Nader voter who was not an idiot know from the polls that Nader would not win."
future knowledge is an impossibility