I just can't get excited by things like "franchise record for TFLs by a corner." Wow, gee wiz, what a meaningless "record"
notGeronimo
joined 2 years ago
I'm the case of this post, they have 1 more win above the spread than random chance would suggest. Which is meaningless.
But, even if they were if they were 8-2 against the spread, rather than 6-2-2, we'd expect about 1.4 teams to hit that mark every year if every spread was 50/50 to hit. The sample sizes in football aren't big enough to matter and patterns in over/unders or spreads are better explained by variance than anything sticky or predictive almost every time.
Only gambling addicts think record against the spread matters
Absolutely not PI
Receiver runs into DB
Illegal contact on DB
Hooray
?