noobdoomguy8658

joined 2 years ago
[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

And the income for one? I'd imagine the taxes would tend to flat out a lot of differences, but I know it's gonna depend on so many things that's it's best to omit it.

[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The layout is what matters for vim and it's derivatives. I might be wrong here, but if you really need to be able to use the same keybindings as you would on a English qwerty one, you could try remapping things to their addresses or whatever that's called - basically the same key, physically, regardless of its layout mapping.

That being said, it's vim, you can remap the command to get back to normal mode from terminal mode to whatever key or key sequence you like most.

Using mouse to scroll up and down your terminal window inside vim also gets you back to normal mode.

And, well, quitting the shell of your terminal in vim works just fine - either via command or hitting Ctrl+d.

[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Ctrl+\ Ctrl+n gets you back to normal mode.

[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

One of the Russian politicians calls this whole tendency "acclamation" - Putin is basically doing it to make everyone nod in agreement, saying that they at least don't mind him being in power; long story short, it a mental gymnastics move to push lies about legitimacy and support around the country and outside so that everyone argues over nothing instead of acting.

And then beatings on top of that.

[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

Given the predatory nature of our species, it's gonna be a tough call moving your head without having your eyes snap to various objects around.

Can't even begin to imagine.

[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

Right, 100%! They're just trying to see if you're going to be able to sustain yourself and their relationship. No harm there, I'm sure; actually seems like a sign of serious intentions.

[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You should check for sure and let us all now. For the boys.

[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago

That's 1318 items, according to that table, counting by seasons. Insane.

[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 48 points 2 years ago (6 children)

She's also definitely Russian, and we, Russians, believe that it's a guy.

There's no women on the Internet.

[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

Gottem balls in ya holes, haha gottem

oh shit

[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

I think we'll collectively figure it out with time and have more specific, yet popular instances, rather than instances trying to be the all-places with communities. Like an instance for memes where communities act as sub-categories or something.

But I maybe wrong, I'm not on oracle or something.

[–] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I feel like it's unlikely to happen regardless of the userbase. Fediverse as a whole seems to have been built on different merits and it's curated by the large corporations, so they won't be coming here with their algorithms and ad-revenue and thirst for profits and engagement.

The biggest difference between Fediverse and the old-school internet websites, like forums and blogs and such, is that Fediverse is relatively easily intertwined; it's an ecosystem that consists of autonomous small-ish communities that get to choose whether and what they share. If you want, you can basically make one account, subscribe to as much shit from the Fediverse as you like, and have it all come to your curated feed (defederation happens, though) - or you can treat it all as separate platforms and have one account for each, with occasional guests hopping by (like you're with d.gs and I'm with feddit.de).

Even if there are platforms that later use the same protocols to try and get some profits, they'll most likely be out of everyone's memory much like Threads (remember that?) because it's just not the same as creating some kind of "everything platform" and have people walled off there to "engage" with rage-inducing content and have them (hopefully) generate ad revenue.

view more: ‹ prev next ›