nonailsleft

joined 2 years ago
[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine having a Trump scar on your forehead 10 years from now

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Counting the mo-nay!

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If they're smart they'll cool the body before they bring in the doctor

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Read till the end he cured him

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a nation built on the graves of the natives

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Police in other countries don’t have to deal with mentally ill people who have turned to drugs

lol

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago

What I found weird was how many large BLM protests were organized for what I think were legitimate cases of police violence. Michael Brown and Jacob Blake come to mind.

Like there are plenty, plenty of legitimate cases, but when the same crowd doesn't seem to make any distinction between obviously trigger happy cops and pretty undisputable self defense, the end goal and the solution becomes very unclear.

As you say: vote for better politicians. Vote for as much footage being recorded (cameras on vehicles, bodycams) and fully released immediately. Advocate people of underrepresented ethnicities joining the police force. It's not easy but it's the real path towards a better situation.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

They'll prefer what the customer wants them to prefer

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Why isn't he letting Rudi handle this

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

'My side'?

This is a religious conflict in which both sides are wrong and evil.

Reading your posts I think it's pretty clear that it's you that's picked a side here that you want to defend. You want to defend it so badly you can't look at a normal title of a news article anymore without getting angry that it's not spinned how you'd want it.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The reason the Israeli airstrikes were cited as pre-emptive is that that adds important information, as in they were aimed at the sites that were about to launch the rockets

Adding that the rocket attack was called retaliatory does not nearly add the same level of information, as everyone already knows what the strike was for and, at the very least, that nearly every strike in this conflict would be called 'retaliatory'. Again, you're pleading for stupid news for stupid people.

Should they have added that it was Hezbollah that restarted this bloody back and forth in each and every title as well?

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You were going to build those PCs out of some cables and old controllers?

view more: ‹ prev next ›