nonailsleft

joined 2 years ago
[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Well tbf this is a pretty shit piece.

First the author conflates that people like being in the EU with the idea that member states should integrate further in (as in cede power to) the EU. Starting off on a lie doesn't usually bode well for this kind of texts.

He claims that this offers opportunities to coordinate migration policies but when they do, it's wrong because he doesn't like the policy. He claims that they should stand strong in military defence against Russian aggression but when they do, he's against it because the moment the US suspended their aid they acted immediately instead of just waiting for checks notes the European Parliament agreeing on starting a unified EU-army.

This guy just reads like someone that wants the EU to become just like the US regarding centralization, but with his own policies instead of those inconveniently voted for by his fellow citizens.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Isn´t this the plot of Die Hard 3

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Sorry I read fart too long

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago

That´s how you build brand confidence

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

self-serving in that it preserves their reputation

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -3 points 3 months ago

A majority of US voters voted for this

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago

Why don't you run yourself?

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago
[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

More like less repairable

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

The US can do a 180 in 4 years. China: not so much

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Then just ask them if they would share their work for free, or recreate it yourself?

view more: next ›