It depends on your opinion. Anarchy isn't a prescriptive unitary ideology, and it's got a lot of different things behind it and subgroups and whatever. You can have Stirner's Egoist perspective on laws, being that you just follow whatever laws suit your own ego, or you can have the Illegalists' perspective on laws, that they're all worth breaking.
The law is a spook. You seem to fundamentally misunderstand the purpose of db0
Children are not fucking chattel and I'm tired of pretending like they are.
"The law discriminates against and limits the freedom of children, therefore they're totally justified!"
Yeah ok sure
Chaos is nice too, though.
Never follow the money. Never follow the money. Nothing is worse than having your soul sucked out of you hour by hour because you wanted to "follow the money."
I'm sick and tired of this Reddit-ass kind of "advice" meant only for neurotypical white men. Male defaultism is one of many things we should not import here.
Start accepting American LGBT refugees then.
If you're looking for someone to say it, you've got me here. Banning children from tobacco doesn't stop them from getting it, banning gambling adverts won't stop them from doing it (cereal box rewards etc) and usually find their ways into nightclubs with alcohol anyways. The only reason these laws exist are to control and subjugate children, not "for their own good." Such paternalist thought leads to shit like children marriage and any number of different types of child abuse, cause if your kid doesn't have any rights, what's stopping the parent from sending their kids to conversion therapy and misgendering then every day?