noli

joined 2 years ago
[–] noli@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

What study is that? Can you give a reference?

[–] noli@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago
[–] noli@programming.dev 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] noli@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How did a bug with something like that never pop up in unit tests?

[–] noli@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you actually read the article, it doesn't say anything about being able to solve the halting problem. It used the undecidability of the halting problem to prove equivalence of another class of problems to the halting problem.

[–] noli@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Also being able to analyze any program and guarantee it will stop

[–] noli@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

I had to translate this to german to understand... and I'm not even german

[–] noli@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What is this recent trend of saying "batteries included" for literally anything software related?

It feels like it tells you nothing at all about the project except that whoever is talking about it is big into buzzwords

[–] noli@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Couldn't you do something like JWT except allow the client to slap on their credentials to any initial request?

From the backend side that means that if there is no valid token, you can check the request body for the credentials. If they're not there, then it's an unauthorized request.

You're eliminating a singular request in a long period of time at the cost of adding complexity to both client and backend but if the customer wants to be silly that's their fault

[–] noli@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

That's actually a great idea

[–] noli@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] noli@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

JS was a mistake.

view more: ‹ prev next ›