if you enjoy looking at them, how is it waste?
nibbler
i firmly believe that we need police. but the police has to be accountable and individually identifiable. this would build the trust needed.
until then: fuck the police
damn, it actually is! 🤣
Your comment made me actually open the article. Sadly your comment seems to be fake. I want to believe!!
it was 64 people. edit: and also, even 29 or something like this is a lot, assuming that they are selected kind of randomly and not all belong to the same social group etc. If only 3 showed a reaction like described, sure. We need more data. but with a hitrate of 100%, what do you expect to happen if you 10x the number?
I agree, the liability for user content in community hosted games is just pure bullshit excuses.
online-only is not bad, some mechanics just work like that. that's totally fine. Just release the server code when you don't want to host any more.
Just release the server code. nothing new has to be created. The industries claim of being liable for user content in this scenario is just bull
You are basically saying that consumer protection is useless, as consumers should protect themselves.
That would be true if all consumers would have the time and understanding to be perfectly informed all the time, which is not realistic.
- brainwallet has entered the chat
die Infos von Tarnkappe sind schon immer interessant, aber wie die Artikel geschrieben sind m(
Drei Absätze in denen exakt das gleiche steht, oder hier: Liste von betroffenen Benutzergruppen... wtf. Mehrwert=0