nanoobot

joined 2 years ago
[–] nanoobot@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Extending the ending of the war by a year would be far worse.

[–] nanoobot@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I don't think that follows at all actually. Every weapon has a balance of harm against benefit, if you outlaw cluster bombs why not mines? Why not grenades, or regular artillery? The reason is because the defensive value outweighs the potential harm. I think it's fairly clear that this is the case for cluster bombs too, while it is not for mustard gas.

The US keeps them because the alternative would cost significant capability. That would need to be made up for with other weapons. Politics and appearance costs impact things too, and for nations that could never stand a chance against russia/China without US help there is a much stronger argument for earning points by outlawing them.

The greatest risk to Ukrainian children is the Russian invasion, and the odds of Ukraine protecting them from that are far greater given these new munitions.

[–] nanoobot@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

The change in the conversation about the importance of alignment this year has been remarkable. Last year had me feeling pretty cynical, but I am starting to feel legitimate hope again.

[–] nanoobot@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sure, but should legality be based on artistic effort? (Not asking you directly, just open to anyone who thinks what SD, etc. do should be illegal.)

[–] nanoobot@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

digikam for image and video collection management and viewing (also does duplicate detection)

[–] nanoobot@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

I agree with you, but this is a really bad counterargument to what they said. Even widely agreed politeness conventions to a degree 'compel' speech, so the debate is really around what speech is acceptable for society to encourage/suppress, rather than whether cultural changes are changing what people are compelled to say. Also, I don't think they said anything that suggested they are more concerned by that than hateful violence?

[–] nanoobot@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The defence against people pretending to be moderate is not to hit everyone who introduces themselves as a moderate in the face with a hammer.

[–] nanoobot@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Give meta the benefit of the doubt? Are you joking? We literally know exactly how awful they are in every area they touch.

[–] nanoobot@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Porco every time for me, feels like a mini holiday every time I watch it, but Totoro would be a close second.

[–] nanoobot@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Ultimately the only thing that matters is if the fediverse is able to reach critical mass, who really gives a shit if reddit manages to limp along for years of gradual decline after all the good contributors leave?

view more: ‹ prev next ›