IMHO, that feature is very broken. It hides read posts pretty much everywhere (except saved posts I think). That means you can't see your own posts, can't see pinned posts/mega-threads, etc.
n2burns
joined 2 years ago
Outside of a relatively small part of this country's geography, that's pretty much all it can be.
Yeah, by geography. However, by population, Via Rail could be relevant to vast majority of Canadians. Over 50% of our population lives in the Corridor alone.
Nobody is expecting it to be competitive or high speed between ... St John's and Montreal.
Crossing part of the Ocean isn't really doable for a train?
Regional rail is quite a different service than intercity rail though. It's like comparing intracity buses to coach buses.
I do think Via could take some hints from GO though, and in certain areas, there's probably demand for something in between (like Ottawa to Montreal).
I think your examples are some ways VIA Rail could get much, much better. At the same time, I'd agree with the article, the train isn't as bad as it's reputation. It's still pretty bad, but driving into downtown Toronto or to YYZ is awful, so for me the train often wins.
I'm confused. You posted it...
It appears they could have easily picked her up (they're 2 officers, she's a small 16yo girl) but they didn't even try and instead chose to just drag her.
That's not modern games, that's brand new hardware. It's a good suggestion, but different than what you originally said.
No, your post says
Do you think that 3 times a year is enough (for example, once in January, once in June, and another one in December)
I assume this is just an error and you didn't mean consecutive months!
I think 3 times a year would be good, but I'd prefer if it was every 4 months instead of after 5 months, then 6 months, then 1 month ;)
Thanks for all your work!
"Completely inappropriate," Blanche said. "Over half the population of this country believe the election was stolen. This trial is not going to solve that."
That's a lie. I don't think at any time a poll showed >50% believed the election was stolen. The most recent ones I can find show somewhere in the 30-40% range. It's still a ridiculously high number, but it's nowhere near "over half".
I don't agree with the root comment, but Wikileaks has repeatedly ignored leaks of Russian classified info and many of their sources appear to be Russian Intelligence.