n1ck_n4m3

joined 1 year ago
[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Face backlash" = about 160,000 people signed a petition saying they disagreed with it, then went about their daily lives and totally, 100% without a doubt continued using their Visa or Mastercard credit cards.

They don't care, there are no alternatives. They can do whatever they want.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I'm curious what it really was. They got a lot of shit for having a single mission with Jabba locked behind DLC (there were many, many other missions with Jabba that weren't locked behind DLC), but I feel that was no different than many other games that add DLC -- any game set in this time period would likely have missions with characters that were from the original trilogy, for Ubisoft to ensure that none of those missions were DLC missions doesn't necessarily seem like it's reasonable if they want the DLC to be of any value.

In any case, having beat it and the DLC, I would totally recommend that people who like that kind of gameplay loop grab it if it's on sale, it was a lot of fun.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I really can't understand all the hate people had for the game.

Yes, it's a typical Ubisoft formulatic exploration/stealth game, very much like Assassin's Creed and Horizon. Yes, it had a digital deluxe edition with a bunch of DLC and an early access window. No, it didn't really break any new ground, but it was a fun game with a good amount of content to do in a reasonably realized game world (even if they really shrunk some locations like Tatooine down to fit into the game). The story was pretty good, the characters were interesting, and the overall gameplay loop was fun.

It deseved better than to be panned by a lot of people complaining the game was woke because the lead was a female who wasn't a 10/10 bombshell in the looks department.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You think that after the changes made to the voting systems, the SAVE voting act, the firing of people at CISA responsible for election safety and security, and the migration of the voting devices to Starlink (even with orage mussilini and muskrat falling out) that there's ever going to be a Democratic president again? I wish I had your optimism. That's if a state of emergency/war isn't called that halts all elections, which is far more likely to be what happens.

Plus, the Democrats will just play good and "not stoop to the opposition's level", letting them just get creamed and steamrolled again in the following election, even if they do somehow manage to win. The Democrats had a chance to fight facism and they welcomed it with open arms. Without turning over nearly the entirety of the party, why does anyone think anything is ever going to change?

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (9 children)

If we ever have another elected president, I hope that one of their first acts after undoing literally everything that the orange menace has done is to replace every picture of trump in any government building with this.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't know why you're getting downvoted, this is the real reason.

In the wake of 9/11, Congress issued a broad, many would say overly broad, Authorization for the Use of Military Force that basically granted the Office of the President open-ended permission for any conceivable martial escapade he might want in the Middle East. Every President of the 21st century has used this as the legal justification for meting destruction onto that part of the world: for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, bombings in Syria, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, and Pakistan, as well as our little-publicized offensive in Northeast Africa.

Due to this, what Trump did is legal. Unfortunately it seems people just want to shoot the messenger now if they say something they disagree with, even if they're correct.

I 100% support removing Trump from power through impeachment and absolutely think he's a threat to democracy, but throwing bullshit articles of impeachment at him over and over just galvanizes his base when he continually shrugs them off.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

It's sad but they've been like this since the get-go. They sued Galoob for the Game Genie (and lost), and they sued Blockbuster for copying manuals so that people could have the manual to review when they rented games (and won). Nintendo has always been excruciatingly aggressive about protecting and policing their copyrights and IP, even when they're dead wrong.

This is not an attempt to justify what they're doing, just to point out that it's unfortunately nothing new.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 76 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Can't wait to pick this up for $30 on PC 3 years after it's released. Fuck $80 games and fuck double-dip releases that don't release same-day on PC.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Stranger Things. Gave up after the first season. It just felt like the show was trying too hard to feel like something nostalgic from the 80s without any of the substance or writing the things from the 80s it was trying to mimic had.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Records don't mean shit when the ruling party is actively destroying records of things they don't like. History is written by the victors, and it's happening in real-time right now.

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Even if he did, Trump would just pardon him

[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (5 children)

This is just the ammunition they'll use when they put a bag over her head and send her to El Salvador.

"We told her she had 7 days to deport. She's an immigrant with no due process. She didn't listen. She's now in CECOT. No, we can't and/or won't get her back, even if we're ordered to do so."

It's blatant at this point.

view more: next ›