There's not a consensus among judges.
Had the Dems done an actual impeachment of Trump, called witnesses and the like, and got a conviction this question would already be answered around the nation. But the half assed it and now we're here.
Dead Palestinians is a Hamas war goal.
2.) Russia will not accept Ukraine being allowed into any military alliance with NATO, and will not accept them being a member.
Russia wasn't going to accept Finland and Sweeden's entries either. Russia doesn't get a choice in the matter.
I'm going to defer on the internal politics. But a strong political faction committed to continuing the war could absolutely delay a ceasefire in an "out of supplies" situation.
It was reconstituted years later. The country was destroyed first.
When NATO started West Germany was the member and East Germany was part of the Soviet block.
not of the country.
The country was split into 4ths.
If all they wanted was genocide they would have stayed on their side of the border and simply shelled Gaza to the ground.
That might be the thing they're wrong about. NATO doesn't allow new members to join who have active territorial disputes. That might be waivable in some fashion but a Ceasefire alone would almost certainly leave Russia in control Crimea.
What they're not wrong about is that while the US is pulling back in its fiscal commitment to Ukraine to boost its commitments to Israel and Taiwan; Europe is all talk about picking up the slack. Ukraine could find itself in a position where she runs out of shells and has to sue for peace at any price.
They're unfortunately not wrong.
Yes the articles linked in the Wikipedia page.
If you'd read the article you'd see that ceasefire for Hamas are routinely violated by them with no consequences.