Critical is one thing -- I actually was convinced recently by Ezra Klein's editorial and Jon Stewart's episode that there are significant reasons to try to put someone other than Biden up in the general election. Why is that? Because they made serious, sensible arguments and seemed genuinely concerned about the future of the country. They didn't say grossly irresponsible things like that there's no difference between Trump and Biden, or give reasons people shouldn't vote in the election. They actually expressed the urgency of what's going to happen in this election as a key reason why it's important to take problems with Biden seriously.
If you were posting things coming at it from that perspective, I'd have no reason to be suspicious of your motives in posting this stuff.
Ah yes, I'm such a right wing shill that I posted an article titled
Yes, your MO seems to be a certain percent generically left-wing things, sort of the minimum required to maintain a fig-leaf of general political interest outside of your clear agenda, combined with a heavy percentage of just pure single-issue anti-Biden propaganda. Your most recent 10 articles show the ratio at 30%/70%. The fact that this is one of the 30% doesn't excuse the 70%, to me.
I literally said that this Gish Gallop moving of goalposts would happen, in the message that you're replying to, and you still did it.
I just looked quickly, but it looks to me like by June, it was 60%, and in October it was 91%.
Now please, move the goalposts to something else, and we can talk about that if I feel like taking the time to address it.
I said before: I've actually noticed that the shills have a tendency to self-identify themselves as coming from some particular place or having LGBTQ identity, which is very unusual to do for most people having discussions on reddit/Lemmy/whatever. I guess the thinking is that people won't be able to disagree with them, because they're "more left" and have greater authority or something?