mozz

joined 2 years ago
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Jesus Christ

I expected it to be corrupt, but I didn't expect it to be that corrupt.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I know what he's saying, yes. Like I say, pressure on Biden over Gaza sounds great, and it actually seems like it's having an impact, although it's still pretty fuckin mild compared with what the US should be doing.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I bet he won't be facing 5 years

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

It's not at all hyperbole. Survivors of the holocaust during Trump's first term specifically brought up how eerie and terrifying was the similarity with what they lived through during the early years, in the long run-up to the full Nazi takeover.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (15 children)

Direct action on Gaza sounds great.

Are you under the impression that MLK was saying, don't vote for Boutwell in his election against Bull Connor, because Boutwell isn't good enough to deserve our support?

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Added in an edit

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Hm.. maybe. I'm not real familiar with them, so maybe they bend the truth to fit the viewpoint sometimes and it's a bad idea to rely on them. But, just looking at this one story I didn't see the viewpoint as all that different from a just mirror image of a factual-but-pro-Israel narrative in an ordinary Western paper. I thought just thought it was useful information about "how much does this resolution actually mean, what might make it enforceable, how much has it changed anything on the ground as of now (i.e. fuck all)" and such.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

It was nonviolent, until bosses/police starting shooting miners and their families, at which point it developed into a small-scale civil war. So yes, I shouldn't have simply said blanket non violent I guess... I was just trying to draw a distinction between "let's fight for justice for ourselves" versus "let's storm the capital and do away with the leaders" as two roads (with the first being more effective, and the second often leading to catastrophe instead of the progress that was hoped for.)

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Intrusive thoughts

(I wish I could find the original without the crap, but that's what I got)

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (104 children)

Agreed. I would add to that -- there's actually an incredibly instructive example to draw by looking at the non-violent-revolutionary movements that did achieve big social change in the past. The US labor movement in the late 1800s, Gandhi's independence movement, the US civil rights movement with its partial victory, things like that. There are a ton of examples of people who achieved big things to revise the systems that rule their daily lives, starting from a way less advantaged position than the left in the modern day US. It's not easy, no, but compared to an Indian person under the British Raj it's an absolute cakewalk.

Strangely enough, the people who are so incredibly upset with the broken system in the US as it pertains to this election (which, yeah, I get that), are somehow totally uninterested in looking at what actions big or small might produce positive change. They're solely focused on criticizing Biden and only Biden, or on saying that it's so broken that we might as well let Trump come to power because what's the difference.

It's like "The plane is having engine trouble and I don't know if we're going to make it. I'm real scared and upset about the situation we're in. I know! Let's shoot the pilot in the head."

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah. This is why I like his table. I get what @Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works is saying in that random encounters can feel kind of same-y and pointless -- but if there's a little subplot that the encounter is looping the players into, where they can decide for themselves how to react to what happens and how much to involve themselves in it -- then it can form instead a good way to add some grist to the let's-have-fun mill.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

A lot of the lemmy.ml subs are very explicitly one-viewpoint subs; the mods will take out comments which advance arguments they don't like. It is a reason I don't bother with them much.

I mean, it makes sense; the administrators argue for explicitly totalitarian states like Russia or China, so it makes sense they'd use the same sort of approach to discourse under their own purview. I am curious what their viewpoint would be if their local government showed up at their door and started treating them like Russia or China treat their social media; I think there's a certain pick-me viewpoint like "obviously I would be one of the good and loyal ones and they'd leave me alone," but I don't think that is how it would work out.

view more: ‹ prev next ›