mozz

joined 2 years ago
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think you broke the code yes. I think it's moderately likely that "get your hands dirty" will become a phrase we hear again in the somewhat-near future as shit gets more and more real leading up to the election.

I'm not saying that at all as a good thing, just where the GOP seems to want things to be heading.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 1 year ago

I think the point is that the US wanders the world (apart from China), election-meddling and influencing and coup-ing, and then all of a sudden when it happens to us it's some kind of pearl clutching emergency and crime.

To be clear, I don't think we should be doing it to other countries, and I don't think they should be doing it to us. And I think the prospect of another Trump presidency would be so catastrophic for people the world over that it's worth resisting election interference on his behalf, even if you have no particular love for the US and its little adventures on the global stage. But certainly the US State Department getting upset that someone's influencing our democracy, even though we don't want them to, can be met with a certain amount of pure derisive laughter.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think the weird arguments are coming from almost all fake accounts. A couple of them behave like people who genuinely believe the things they're saying, but actually the vast majority of them do not. In my opinion.

I'll never claim to be 100% accurate at telling who is and isn't a faker (and I'm not sure the effort is even a worthwhile thing to spend much energy on), but just consider from this thread the difference of people who are saying things like:

It's cute when the US accuses countries of interfering with elections like they're protecting their world record or something

the hypocrisy is astounding. The USA has been interfering in elections for the year dot.

And people who are saying things like:

After this dude has been caught in like half a dozen lies on behalf of Israel in the last few months, who believes anything he has to say about anything?

They are priming the response when Biden loses, so they can blame someone else for their ineptitude and failure to govern.

To me, it sounds like one grouping read the article / headline, had thoughts occur to them based on the article they read, and typed out those thoughts. It sounds like the other grouping has a little bulleted list in front of them "things we'd like to bring up about the Biden administration" and made a halfhearted attempt at "smooth"ly interjecting them into this topic.

I've seen them slip and interject a talking point that's a total incongruity for the target audience / forum (as one of them did down below with January 6th being a peaceful protest), and I've seen them apparently fail to register that the talking point they're bringing up relates in some way to the topic of the article -- just sort of blandly repeat it with that same "we all agree" fellow kids type of energy instead of grasping the obvious relationship between what they're saying and what's in the article or whatever.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Also, from the link I sent:

Two lightning strikes during launch. The first strike, at 36 seconds after liftoff, knocked the three fuel cells offline and the craft switched to battery power automatically. The second strike, at 52 seconds after liftoff, knocked the onboard guidance platform offline. Four temperature sensors on the outside of the Lunar Module were burnt out and four measuring devices in the reaction control system failed temporarily. Fuel cell power was restored about four minutes later.

Don't just say "power was restored." TELL THE STORY YOU PUSSY

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 77 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Her daughter Kennedy looked confused, according to Noem, asking: “Hey, where’s Cricket?”

Jesus tapdancing Christ

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm not saying large scale death of the world's coral or insects or amphibians or wild mammals isn't a big deal, because it is

But if we survive what's coming, then in retrospect, the loss of all the world's coral will not even register on the severity-scale of what were the most impactful impacts

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Just tryin to help you with your messaging man

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Which is unforgivably low. Check the dates and see if you notice a modern-day program that’s overrepresented.

Space travel is dangerous and anyone who flies in space understands that and signed up for it. But the shuttle program had deliberately and pointlessly unsafe decisions that were taken for reasons of cost-cutting or simple management incompetence, and all the dead astronauts on those two shuttles are a direct result.

If you know you’re going to fly 135 missions, and you accept a 1.5% catastrophic failure rate, then you’re accepting blowing up two shuttles with everyone on board. Which is exactly what 1980s-era NASA did, not because it was an inevitable reality they couldn’t avoid, but because management had their heads up their asses and wasn’t invested in the idea of sacrificing their own convenience in order to keep the program safer than 1.5%.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That narrative is from a while ago - in this thread they seem to still be stuck on “Biden is bad, genocide, union buster, as a good leftist person I can’t support him and you shouldn’t either,” even in this article that has nothing to do with that. Also there’s someone who’s saying January 6th wasn’t real.

Someone needs to update their configuration a little, I think.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

Bro…

I think you probably wanna restrict the “J6 was a peaceful protest” stuff to some of your other accounts that hold some other ostensible viewpoints (probably fully off Lemmy, instead in some place where people get their news more in short-form-video-with-text-over-it format). It will absolutely not get traction here and it will absolutely cause people to look at your account and its motivations in a WHOLE different light.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I thought they had posted that they'd already made the decision of what platform to switch to, but weren't announcing it yet (which seemed weird to me). Sublinks honestly would make some sense given the Lemmy-compatibility and emphasis on mod tools, which I know was a constant pain point for them... but IDK if it's mature enough. But yeah if you told me they were waiting for it to mature so they could switch over, that would make sense.

I'm also very curious to see how (if at all) you migrate an existing server with all its existing ActivityPub keys and subscriptions to a new piece of software, on the same domain, without unfixably breaking its federation with every other instance. My guess is that they will switch to a different beehaw.(whatever) domain but I'm curious if there's a good solution I'm not aware of.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Is sublinks what they're switching to? I was curious about that. I'm not real aware of a good substitute for Lemmy / kbin / mbin as of right now; it doesn't seem like there's a fully perfect solution available.

view more: ‹ prev next ›