morphballganon

joined 2 years ago
[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com -2 points 2 days ago

... it is though. "The first of..." you still have absolutely zero information and can't begin to think of how to react. "August..." you know it's in the future. You've got context. You can plan. Infinitely better.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Anyone standing up for anything must be a dipshit" ok buddy

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com -2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Is that the new "virtue-signaling" type of criticism? Basically how you out yourself as a dipshit?

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 3 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Well, as someone with a moral compass, when I see disinformation being spread, I feel obligated to dispute it...

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 17 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Or computational intelligence isn't the same thing as skepticism

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hey sweatpants can do some work. Are they grey?

Also 40s can be good-looking

And "fat" is pretty subjective; people with average bodytypes can be very successful with confidence

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Cue Cletus declaring that Obama failed it but Trump passed

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Condescending word for naïve person

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 35 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Buy old stuff

Use open source

Downdate

etc

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 5 points 1 week ago

It's not plank if you're on your elbows

 

Say I am interacting with user abc in a comment chain. If they start acting incendiary and I block them, I can no longer see abc's comments. This would be fine, except... if user xyz responds to one of my comments in that comment chain, I have no way of interacting with that. Want to reply? Want to block them, too? Too bad, the entire chain is invisible (but you're still notified about xyz's comment, which you can do nothing about).

Maybe instead of making abc's comments invisible, they could be replaced by a comment box with "blocked user" instead, so the rest of the comment chain remains intact?

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 0 points 2 weeks ago

They want to appeal to the bigoted white male demographic. Nothing against the lead actor himself but he plays a lot of bigot characters. Judge Dredd, a guy that goes around shooting people with impunity? Doomslayer, a guy who's immune to the disease turning people into zombies? Skurge, a guy trying to show off for women by amassing assets? Bones, a guy who is charming and flirty with women but aloof and grumpy with men?

 

Daily deals

 

Daily Deals

 

Daily Deals

 

Daily deals

 

Daily deals

 

Djinn of Fool's Fall looks a lot like a Tarkir Djinn: here

Smirking Spelljacker and Haughty Djinn don't look anything like the Djinn from Tarkir, though, they're much more human-like in face shape: here and here.

Are those ones from somewhere else?

 

Or, is anyone else bothered by Innistrad having only 4 provinces?

 

Daily deals

 

I was just playing a game where my opponent was on mono W tokens and had a Mondrak out. The triggers took so long to resolve (with no player input needed) that it ran down two of MY timers... and subsequently skipped through my following turn. I didn't end up drawing the combo piece I needed, but if I had, this UI behaviour would have been the reason I lost. I was getting ready to cast something (even though it wouldn't have saved me) but the UI just jumped straight from my draw step to my opponent's turn.

Whose idea was it to have automated triggers count against a player's timer?

Anyway, I'm posting this here since the WotC feedback channel requires a login to post.

 

See attached. Ignore the red part. Blue arrow points at a delete button that gives this strange error. I've obscured the private message for anonymity, previously above those buttons.

Is this button supposed to work? Why does the error talk about editing, if it's a delete button?

 

Daily Deals

view more: next ›