monotremata

Thanks, Stefon.

I think so? It's section 3.2 of the paper: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17452759.2024.2404157#d1e604

They don't talk that much about current in particular; figure 5 only shows the resistance in the regulated output path as a function of the voltage on the control path, which isn't enough to actually say whether there's specifically current amplification. (Also, the gain would be negative; does that matter?) But they do discuss the fact that the output channel is much wider, which strongly suggests it's able to pass more current (since they mention the resistivity drops as the cross-sectional area of the trace increases). The wider trace is one that wouldn't have the fuse behavior on its own, because the resistivity is too low for it to heat up enough to trigger that at the voltages they're using, but the close proximity of the very thin fusing wire of the control signal is enough to cause a nonlinear resistivity change in the output path as well. I think that means they're using a single voltage for both kinds of path, and that the control current is thus lower than the output current because the resistance on the control path is higher, but I'm not certain. I am not an electrical engineer, just an enthusiastic amateur.

They did do the thing that HewlettHackard is describing. Check out the AND gate in the linked article. The input paths are short and use small wires, but also cross the larger paths that normally link the output to ground. If both are active, the paths to ground are interrupted, and the resistor to VCC pulls up the output. So they did make logic gates. In the paper they also demonstrate NOT and OR.

I gather there's a technical sense of "active" that's used in electrical engineering that might not apply here, but to someone like me, with only a tinkerer's knowledge of components, logic gates seem like enough to justify the term in the headline.

Thanks!

Yeah. I thought it was important context that they had backpedalled, but I did not intend to downplay the severity of the issue.

Citizens United would be a decent candidate. Once it was established that donations were protected political speech, it effectively legalized bribery, and made oligarchy essentially inevitable. Most of the missteps since then have been motivated by folks trying to simultaneously play to populist talking points but also placate billionaire donors. The left needed an actual positive message, like the kind Bernie Sanders was pushing, that would energize folks and unite the overeducated with the working class, but that was never going to be acceptable to the donor class, and so candidates like him always had to be shoved aside for someone who would clearly cater to corporate needs. And someone who would clearly cater to corporate needs was always going to be a really tough sell and not really a solution to the needs of the moment.

That doesn't really account for the rise of the tech bro fascist accelerationists like Mencius Moldbug and the Dark Enlightenment, which is a big part of the current moment and accounts for how the far right was able to hoodwink some billionaires into voting for a social collapse that seems very likely to hurt them also. But Citizens United still seems like a fair candidate for a point at which some of the last paths away from this outcome were foreclosed.

My guess is that the reason they bothered with this, rather than leaving it with the courts, is that this version would allow Trump to abruptly reverse the things that were previously decided under Chevron deference.

Supposedly they're unblocked again, but there's been no explanation from Xitter about the issue. Definitely seems suspicious that this happened while DOGE is having trouble with whistleblowers using Signal, though.

https://gizmodo.com/x-briefly-blocked-then-unblocked-signal-links-as-federal-workers-seek-security-2000564966

I think the issue is with it being just a single wall. The slicer tends to have some trouble with that.

My first thought was just to model the return paths as well, making it a loop, print that in vase mode, then just cut away the unwanted parts. My second thought was to wonder whether there would be a way to use post-processing to set the extrusion to zero for those particular paths, maybe using the multicolor features, and thereby avoid printing the extra area.

https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/digital_data.png

Yeah, agreed.

I think you're wildly underestimating the influence of those sites. And even beyond those sites, think about how many sites can only exist because of payments from ads served by those same operators. It's true they don't control the whole Internet, but they sure have a ton of power.

I also don't think the level of control Trump will have over PBS is worse than the influence he'll exert over mainstream media sites through the threat of legal harassment alongside his indirect control of the discourse on Twitter.

I guess mostly I remember the Internet in the days before it got so corporate, when it was wild and wooly, and all the sites were bizarre little labors of love created purely because someone just really wanted to post information about their Special Interest. (E.g., I had an old Tripod site that was just a detailed explanation of the shape of a module for a five intersecting tetrahedra origami model, complete with folding diagrams and descriptions of the approximations I'd used to simplify it and how the lengths related to each other. Then my hard drive crashed and I went to grab those files back from my site and discovered they'd deleted the whole thing because I hadn't updated the site, which had never occurred to me because, well, it was just this info, it didn't need updating. Those were the early days of corporatization.)

So when I picture a public-subsidized Internet, that's pretty much what I think of. People being people, sharing information out of weird enthusiasm. I think it would work in practice because we've had that kind of thing before. Lemmy is honestly kind of a similar thing right now; it's just that some kind, generous souls are paying for the servers, which is likely going to be hard to sustain eventually.

I dunno. It's dark times for sure.