Oh, that's a thought, I'm not sure how the strain gauges factor in.
monotremata
I can't find very good images of the bed mechanism in the machine, but it looks to me like there's a separate piece for the machine that mounts the nut for the leadscrew to the bed. The easiest way to make it more adjustable might be to design and print a replacement for this part that allows you to use a screw to offset this connection slightly. You could probably get away with just making the front two adjustable and leaving the back one fixed.
Another thing that can cause this is if the extruder motor overheats. Is the cold end fan running? Is the motor hot to the touch?
The tech behind the s-pen is made by Wacom, and they're in the USI, so I don't think it's totally impossible. Pens are just pretty niche right now, partly because the android tablet market is so lousy. I think the tech has improved a bit--supposedly they're down to a 0.7mm tip now, which is in the range where handwriting on a phone starts to make sense again. So maybe we'll see more uptake of these, especially if the foldables market grows.
The use cases I really want to see for this tech are things like an advanced calculator that lets you handwrite an integral and then gives you the closed form solution if it exists, or a graph, etc. if it doesn't; and a nice pen-driven CAD program. Those would be amazing things to have in your pocket all the time, but they're a little too intricate to work well with fat fingers on a phone.
But for now I don't think the tech is really quite good enough for phones. It's good enough for my brother-in-law, who is an animator, to use it to doodle all the time, but that's kinda it. On the iPad Pro he can do a lot more with the Apple Pencil, but that has more to do with the Apple tablet software ecosystem than with the pen itself, and Google has neglected that aspect of Android. On phones the pens just seem pretty limited.
Oh great, a "sovereign organism" movement...
Yeah, it's not there for me. I've got "view your profile," messages (which is a fakeout, as you can't actually view them on the mobile website), groups, marketplace, friends, "videos on watch", pages, dating, saved, memories, events, games, "climate science information center", "ads manager", "orders and payments", "most recent", settings, dark mode, "privacy shortcuts", language, help, "support inbox", about, "report a problem", and logout. No feeds. I've never seen it.
I don't get the "feeds" option on the mobile website with Android Chrome.
You were pretty unlucky to buy a Pixel 5A in 2022. Every Pixel device that's been released since October 2021's Pixel 6 has had 5 years of security updates*, including the A line starting with the Pixel 6A in mid-2022. So the only phone Google still sold in the first half of 2022 that didn't have that was the 5A.
At this point the Pixel phones specifically do have pretty decent support lifetimes. iPhones are still doing better, and Android phones in general are terrible about it, but for the Pixels in particular this has ceased to be a big issue. It sounds like you managed to snag the very last phone with this problem.
*They still only get 3 years of OS upgrades, but that hasn't made a meaningful difference in several years.
Even with wired headphones, the volume setting didn't directly correspond to a decibel level. High quality headphones often have a higher impedance than cheaper ones, which makes them much quieter (unless you use an external amp). The automatic volume reducer thing was just always pretty frustrating in the past.
The really bizarre thing is that the contract covered the watering for the first year, and only then reverted to an ODOT responsibility. Which means that maintenance was definitely discussed at some point during the planning phase. Someone at ODOT really screwed up here.
I haven't experienced layer adhesion dropping with higher nozzle sizes. Are you setting volumetric flow rate limits? If you don't limit the volumetric flow rate, and try to run higher nozzle diameters at the same speed as smaller ones (especially with greater layer heights), then this could cause that issue, because you're extruding material that isn't adequately melted. But in general, nozzle diameter and layer adhesion shouldn't be closely related.
Minimum feature size, on the other hand, is definitely related, and is indeed the main reason you might want a small nozzle or low layer height.
It sounds to me like it's pretty similar to how home oxygen concentrators work, but with an MOF instead of a zeolite, and driving out the adsorbed material via increased temperature rather than decreased pressure. MOFs are pretty comparable to zeolite in cost, and both can be used as molecular sieves, as in this case. Maybe you can find a video on oxygen concentrators that would help you understand it?
One difference here is that in the oxygen concentrator, the output product is the air, but with the nitrogen sequestered out; here, the output product is the water sequestered from the air. But this leads me to think that maybe this tech could also actually be used for air dehumidification, which could drive down the energy use of air conditioners. That could be another big win, since air conditioning is a major use of fossil fuel energy and contributes significantly to climate change, which is part of what's driving the drinking water shortages in the first place.