monobot

joined 4 years ago
[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

I like the idea of Mozilla providing, even thou it can just be rebranding, some privacy concious services. Like reselling real private VPN, email, storage... with their brand.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 years ago (4 children)

This thread reminds me of stackoverflow, most people are just convincing you in something else and it is obvious they have never been in your (and mine) situation.

Just answer question if you have some idea, yes we know python exist, that's nice, but not an answer to this question.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I don't know how it works, but can you quit if you notice it is too much for you?

If it is about paying for school, give it one year and don't get into debt until you know you can go through it.

On another note, the reason I decided to chip in:

I've been known to be a very emotional person. I'm sensitive, right?

Nope. If you are like me, your mother convinced you and others around you that you are "sensitive" and "emotional". You ware actually neglected or traumatized in so way, maybe both. Probably by narcissistic person that convinced you in your sensitiveness.

I would suggest therapy if what is said hits close to home.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think he did suggest droid-ify with fdroid repo: https://github.com/Droid-ify/client

Looks good, I will try it out. You have it in F-droid :)

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

You are correct, it while it was technically driver for kernel, meaning it is using kernel driver api, it was not driver for graphic card. Just a bit different way to load binary blob.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

Ghosts'N Goblins 🤘

That music always gives me goosebumps.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

Here is some explanation from firefox dev from two years ago https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/md63k4/comment/gs8mo2t/

The answer is complicated.

Mobile operating systems don't have swap space. When running multiple apps, a mobile OS needs to be more aggressive at freeing memory than desktop operating systems do. They do this by terminating background processes. The OS uses various heuristics to decide which process(es) to kill.

The problem that you're seeing is not intentional on our part; there isn't something in Firefox that says, "unload everything whenever I go into the background." Instead, it is caused by the content processes being terminated by Android itself.

We know that Chromium-based browsers seem to be working better in this regard. We do not yet have a clear picture about what specifically is causing our content process to be a frequent target.

We're in the process of collecting additional telemetry to help us diagnose this. I've also landed a patch that helps to clean up content process memory usage when Android tells us that it needs memory, in the hope that it will reduce the likelihood of a content process termination. We're also testing Nightly with multiple content processes enabled, which may help.

At any rate, I wouldn't call this problem an intentional design decision, nor would I call it solved. We're doing what we can to learn more about it and get it fixed at some point.

Sounds to me android is by design letting chrome based browsers and killing everything else.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Sounds to me it is MIUI that kills a lot of stuff for me all the time, I also don't know how to prevent it.

One way I do is start that other app first, than open needed tab in Firefox and do quick switch between apps. In that way FF is not reloading page, not Bitwarden but might be similar.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Isn't gcam still google's app?

I think they hard code gallery started from their app, xiaomi does that too. Solution might be other camera app, like someone mentioned opencamera.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Are we talking about present or future?

Nuclear has a chance in thorium and malten salt reactors, uranium is made for nuclear booms, not for safe energy generation.

Sadly, no one is investing enough in thorium and malten salt to make it available in next 10-20 years, we have better chance in fusion than thorium.

Until than, sorry, but while you are right, that technology is not yet available.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago (28 children)

And are we taking into account safe storage of nuclear waste for thousands of years (which we as civilization still don't even have) or not?

Today's journalists are really superficial.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I agree with you, I miss comments from random people, even on youtube, most of the time it os some useful insight.

That was the worst part of having some subscription, no coments.

This is consequence of walked garden. Creators should be compensated, but this model is not for me.

view more: ‹ prev next ›