mojo

joined 2 years ago
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

DDG proves literally all of that false. Also just use AdBlock with it. Elaborate on it working in private browsing without needing to login.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Neo Nazis doing antifa's job for them.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 65 points 2 years ago (4 children)

should be legal to yeet it and delete it

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

All I want is a conclusion to the FF:06:B5 mystery!

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

These are a lot more reasonable terms, but remember that the people who designed the outrageous policy is still very much in charge at that company. They'll keep pushing to see what they can get away with, they just fucked up by pushing too much at once instead of building up to it.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Typically every search query on Kagi will call a number of different sources at the same time, all with the purpose of bringing the best possible search results to the user.

But most importantly, we are known for our unique results, coming from our web index (internal name - Teclis) and news index (internal name - TinyGem). Kagi's indexes provide unique results that help you discover non-commercial websites and "small web" discussions surrounding a particular topic.

They just proxy searches and then sort them lol. Definitely caching thrown in there too, as if that even changes anything. You're paying $10/mo for that when DDG does the same thing for free.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

When you are using any sort of navigation app, do you believe the navigation is the final verdict? That if it tells you to drive off a cliff that you have to? If you disagree, then you agree that it's not Google Maps at fault here. That's why that logic is dumb as hell. The maps provider is completely irrelevant, and so is the map being correct or not.

My Google Maps didn't tell me that there was road under construction and to merge into a lane. So I guess I should've just gunned it and run everyone over then, makes sense.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Lol I think the driver with fucking eyeballs should see they're driving off of a bridge. The maps on Google is literally irrelevant. Not once does your comment suggest they're somehow a conscious human being that has eyes and should be looking where they drive.

Maps don't have to be right for you to know that maybe you should actually look forward when you're driving, but apparently expecting basic ass human autonomy is being a corporate share holder, what a joke.

The driver is responsible for their safety, they're the one's controlling the vehicle. GPS navigation is a suggestion on where to go, not the final verdict which you for some reason think it is. Did you think the driver just saw the road, put his hands up and think, "Well shit, Maps says to drive off this cliff, I guess I have to!"

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

Lol I think the driver with fucking eyeballs should see they're driving off of a bridge. The maps on Google is literally irrelevant. Not once does your comment suggest they're somehow a conscious human being that has eyes and should be looking where they drive.

Maps don't have to be right for you to know that maybe you should actually look forward when you're driving, but apparently expecting basic ass human autonomy is being a corporate share holder, what a joke. The driver is responsible for their safety, they're the one's controlling the vehicle. GPS navigation is a suggestion on where to go, not the final verdict which you for some reason think it is.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

That's awesome, and I still know that you don't know what you're talking about. But damn you made me a soyjack, that definitely tells me you've actually looked into the technical differences.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

My comment says search engines. I specifically said that because I was not including Google. I know you specifically mentioned Google because other privacy search engines prove what you say as false. By that logic literally everything with consumers is a product, that's such a vague statement.

view more: ‹ prev next ›