And it would still benefit for taking a week to formally define its interface before Linus started coding.
Also, basic is famous for being already fully specified and mostly stolen from other people's work.
mmddmm
joined 5 months ago
Yes, it's because despite the problem being the same for everybody, the "treatment" has to be very different. So it's better if you break it down into two different epidemics.
And one gets more attention because every single well known and applied procedure to fight the epidemics don't work for them.
On gold connectors... Are you afraid your signal will reflect back into the antenna? Do people really do that?
But yeah, also you can make sure it resonates on the correct frequency by mechanically adjusting it and looking for the feedback.
Yes, it's the obvious extension from what we have now, and quite coherent for explaining some universe that isn't the one we live in.
It just shouldn't have monopolized theoretical physics for a generation. It's really hard to imagine something different, but this is even more reason to celebrate the people trying that, not to shun then and focus on what you already have.
It's not either. Those things companies are trying to sell you out there and CEOs are ordering you to use unambiguously suck.
Oh, a song from the time superstrings were still cool?
They had tails.
Yeah, it's because of the tariffs people. There are only the tariffs, there's nothing else to see here. Move along.
India makes a huge amount of drugs. The UK probably just doesn't import them.
Hum... Putting them in quotes is nice, it reminds people of the claim.
I think the best would be to also explain in parenthesis, like: "reciprocal" (unilateral)
Idk what the fuck this is.
No problem, I could see some "economist" from the government saying exactly that in an interview.
Help, I'm being oppressed!