Thanks, but that looks like a long way of saying that you don't know any socials that allow effective parental oversight. They know and use many of the things you mention, and have a good open communication with their children, as far as I can l tell, but I suspect you never quite know how a child will react if things go bad.
mjr
joined 5 months ago
Nah, he's not Blair. Seems more likely an echo of his parents' values plus guilt at it happening while he was leader. Wasn't one parent some sort of religious minister?
This seems like one of those cases where you wish both sides could lose. Reddit are up to no good, but lack of identity document demands isn't it.
Baftas 2026: BBC apologises for not editing out racial slur shouted by guest with Tourette's - BBC News – https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz6edwg06n1o
Some are unhappy with how weak the apology is, but contrary to the above report that they said they didn't notice, it says
The corporation declined to comment further on why it wasn't initially edited or bleeped out.
Paint seems easier to detect and remove.
By the time Facebook started to come around, being online was more of a normal thing, so there were more women and girls online.
Well, yes, that's why Zuck started Facemash, to let him and his pals rate the faces of those people.
Secondly, it’s not the government’s responsibility to surveil kids online, it’s primarily the parents’ responsibility! If you as a parent are unaware of your kid being hateful and a bigot online, you’re part of the problem.
Is there a good guide to what social apps actually let parents oversee their kids and how? I have some friends with children reaching the age where they'll be allowed onto these sites but are still legally children in their country.
I feel like there are incentives for the social sites to be seen as the private and anti-parent ones, rather than grasses/snitches.
I think it's not that unusual in Australian English and how are you so expert on what terms are in porn?
They think it's now acceptable.
Facebook has a certain level of moderation, as is required by a lot of countries.
Where that level of moderation is negligible and ineffective. It's a sham.
And politicians basically banning Facebook don’t get many votes
How do we know? Who's tried it? They're all scared that facebook will start working against them, as it allegedly has in some referendums and elections.
Also, I don’t personally use it but isn’t Facebook one where you’ll only get comments from people you’ve first connected with?
🤣🤣🤣 No. There's loads of "promoted" posts in your feed for years now.
lemmy is only took off because reddit policed it and kicked most of the users here off.
Other waves arrived here because reddit kicked all the independent apps off, and started feeding all community discussions to AI.
Not expecting complete, but something a bit more than Meta's new "you should panic now" emails.
Surely a truly family -friendly DNS would blackhole most corporate social media.