Hang on, that's not a decreasing trend. 1/√4 is not smaller, but larger than 1/4...?
mitrosus
joined 2 years ago
Great. Can you give me example of decreasing trend slower than that function curve?, where summation doesn't give finite value? A simple example please, I am not math scholar.
In this example, there were 100 choices in the beginning, and later you reduced to 2 choices. Clearly an advantage. Does the same apply to the 3 door problem?
Let's take this question in another angle. Instead of 3, there are only 2 doors. I am to choose one out of 2, which has a prize. After I choose one, you show me a third door which is empty. Now, should I change my option?
I: 27
You: The number is either 27 or 44. Do you want to change your choice?
I: why would I?
The same reason we use ship for a cargo and car for shipping.
That's what Buddhas have been saying!
So the resolution lies in the secret that a decreasing trend up to infinity adds up to a finite value. This is well explained by Gabriel's horn area and volume paradox: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZOi9HH5ueU
No. No. You choose to be ignorant.
Smiling over Gnome at Kathmandu, the capital.
No. Moneyory fine should not be a form of punishment. I am for old fashioned style, an extreme example is to call the CEO, make him dance around the EU naked and then make him collect the shoes while returning home.
Only for fedora?
Yes that one. Similar to the one you did with 100 doors, just in opposite direction.