missveeronica

joined 2 years ago
[–] missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From what I saw, even the Democrat AG of New Mexico won't support or defend this in court.

[–] missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Double album, four decent songs. Just my honest opinion. Your milage may vary.

[–] missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

According to the article from the nytimes, she raised money by asking for tokens in exchange for their suggestions to perform sex acts.

Edit: or was it wapo? I read it somewhere that she was accepting money in exchange for sex acts.

[–] missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

My comment was about how she feels this is an invasion of privacy not about the legality of the situation. She posted these on the internet with her own free will for money. She didn't have a problem posing for them.when it benefited her. Now, though, it's a problem.

Personally, I have no problem with her wanting to explore her sensuality. Good for her. I stop feeling sorry for her when she then declares it an invasion of privacy.

[–] missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (41 children)

I find it funny that they used the term "invasion of privacy". She and her hubby went onto Chatterbate (I don't know the exact website name) and took tips from others to perform (according to my morning paper). That's a public display. And the fact that it didn't dawn on her that this could be out there is astonishing. I know if I ever put a picture on the internet, it's there FOREVER, and just because I'm a nobody doesn't mean someone out there archived it for later.

Edit: I changed leaked to invasion of privacy.

[–] missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just one part of his body needed to be behind the line of scrimmage. I haven't seen the full play, but from the screenshot, it looks like his right foot is behind that line, which counts. But I can't tell for sure.

[–] missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

So you're okay with it being fine for a White House administration telling tech companies what they can and can't allow? If so, then just wait until.the next Republican gets into the White House. You may not like this because it's against Bidens White House, but this ruling will prevent Trump from doing it as well...if he somehow got back into office....which won't happen, but still. It's a precedent.

[–] missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 years ago

I got around that by hardcoding foreign subs into mp4's.

[–] missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 years ago

This is actually common. My brother in law lost his state job when he enlisted in the National Guard. They claimed it was for another reason, but his issues with managing didn't start until he announced he had enlisted. He sued, won and got his job back after boot camp. His first day back he turned in his 2 Weeks notice. For these cases it's just proving the point and winning the right to go.out on their own terms.

[–] missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Not only that, but now all apps have to have remove any Screensaver that kept the screen active on that app. For instance, Plex now doesn't have a Screensaver so if you are listening to music and pause it too long, you lose all progress on that Playlist and it starts all over again. Big bummer that is making me question getting a new Roku later this year.

[–] missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We carry small portable surveillance technology with us everywhere, even to the bathroom and a new car is supposed to worry me?

view more: ‹ prev next ›