mike

joined 4 years ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Do science dioramas still have a place in today’s museums? in c/history@fedia.io
[–] mike@sauropods.win 1 points 6 months ago

@ScienceDesk@flipboard.social Duh, yes.

My real worry with Google's voyage into enshittification (thanks to Cory Doctorow @pluralistic the term) is YouTube. in c/technology@lemmy.ml
[–] mike@sauropods.win 1 points 1 year ago

@jeroen @ajsadauskas @pluralistic @technology @fanf @brewsterkahle And THAT Is why commercial companies want to destroy archive.org

According to this analysis of VAR decisions for the 22/23 season, Liverpool were the joint second beneficiaries of VAR decisions, while City were bottom. in c/football@lemmy.world
[–] mike@sauropods.win 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@hallenbeck Strongly agree with every part of that. I don't know if Spurs fans have someone doing similarly detailed work? (Actually, I don't know if ANYONE has!)

According to this analysis of VAR decisions for the 22/23 season, Liverpool were the joint second beneficiaries of VAR decisions, while City were bottom. in c/football@lemmy.world
[–] mike@sauropods.win 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

@hallenbeck @football Yes, it's very satisfying to be discussing thr facts of the matter in such a civilised manner!

/tips hat/

According to this analysis of VAR decisions for the 22/23 season, Liverpool were the joint second beneficiaries of VAR decisions, while City were bottom. in c/football@lemmy.world
[–] mike@sauropods.win 4 points 2 years ago (5 children)

@hallenbeck @football Does this only show that more initially incorrect decisions were made against Brentford, Fulham and Liverpool than against Leeds, Brighton and Man City?

In any case, VAR overturns are such infrequent events that you can't really draw statistically significant conclusions from them.