meyotch

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 minutes ago

Ok, you are a sealion, cool, good to know.

Did you know you can mention multiple facts about a person in a biography and they are all valid and mentionable?

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I no longer use greasy moisturizers at all and I have very sensitive dry skin that needs help.

Hyaluronic acid is dirt cheap and works by attracting moisture from the air, rather than a coating of something greasy.

I mix a half gram into 300ml distilled water, some lavender oil just for a pleasant scent, and a few drops of a leucacidal preservative made for cosmetics (i make big batches cuz lazy and it prevents bacterial growth). A half kilo bag is maybe $25 USD so I have a lifetime supply.

Even in our insanely dry climate I no longer get itchy inflamed skin in the winter. And it’s super easy to just spray it all over after a shower.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I helped maintain a dermestid beetle colony that was used by a natural history museum to prep specimens for display.

They are surprisingly easy to care for. It was just a large wooden box full of ripped up paper egg cartons. Drop a nice head in there and mist the cardboard with some water. Soon you have a nice clean skull. When not using it, just mist the cardboard once a week. The beetles just hang out between feedings.

For science purposes only, folks

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 hours ago

Same phenomenon that 40% of sick days taken at work are on Monday or Friday.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 hours ago

We usually use the word “disappointing” but a competent writer can put a positive spin on anything.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Yes.

Would one question the relevance of a biography that mentioned that an accomplished straight male scientist was a ‘family man’ or that a scientist was also a married woman with children?

Questioning the validity of mentioning that a scientist is queer is identical to the attitude that queer people are fine as long as they are invisible.

It was a biography, biographies mention biographical details. Yet when that detail is ‘queer’, people feel empowered to complain it was even mentioned.

I’m not on the defensive here. I intend to come across as offensive. You tell US exactly why mentioning that a person is queer is not relevant in a biographical sketch.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net -4 points 19 hours ago

This is not objectively true.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net -4 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Did you know that your post, if copied exactly as written into a search engine, would yield a factual answer to your question?

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 1 points 20 hours ago

But that’s what ‘orgone’ means, ‘or gone’. Which I support, because fsck Boolean operators.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 3 points 20 hours ago

Makes sense, same as a Prius, which is also gay

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net -5 points 20 hours ago

It means the researchers are high on the smell of their own farts and will be offended if you ask them to show their work

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

So far! I yearn for us to try out Arcologies. They are basically just cities without sprawl. A man can dream…

 

This is a part two of a similar question asked here: https://slrpnk.net/post/24228904

Basically I am workshopping progressive sligans. I am a basic agitator and interact with a lot of people who lean progressive but aren’t politically engaged yet. Crowd-sourcing the revolution, I guess.

 

Or the one?

I would be curious what Lemmings think the results of a survey would be, if that question were asked in a non-political setting?

 

I mean a cosmically fair tribunal.

 
 
 

The internet did not invent the human anus.

Prove me wrong.

 

I am finally making the push to self host everything I possibly can and leave as many cloud services as I can.

I have years of linux server admin experience so this is not a technical post, more of an attempt to get some crowd wisdom on a complex migration.

I have a plan and have identified services i would like to implement. Take it as given that the hardware I have can handle all this. But it is a lot so it won’t happen at once.

I would appreciate thoughts about the order in which to implement services. Install is only phase one, migration of existing data and shaking everything down to test stability is also time consuming. So any insights, especially on services that might present extra challenges when I start to add my own data, or dependencies I haven’t thought of.

The list order is not significant yet, but I would like to have an incremental plan. Those marked with * are already running and hosting my data locally with no issues.

Thanks in advance.

Base system

  • Proxmox VE 8.3
    • ZFS for a time-machine like backup to a local hdd
    • Docker VM with containers
      • Home Assistant *
      • Esphome *
      • Paperless-ngx *
      • Photo Prism
      • Firefly III
      • Jellyfin
      • Gitea
      • Authelia
      • Vaultwarden
      • Radicale
      • Prometheus
      • Grafana
 

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/12/astonishing-level-dehumanization/681189/

The pearl clutching is strong with this one. As usual, they gloss over the fact that health insurance profits are determined by the denial rate. The author conflates necessary rationing of care in any system with the clear incentive of for-profit insurance to deny care. Such cupidity.

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378020307512

I would love to hear perspectives on the relative strengths and shortcomings of this study.

While the solarpunk in me loves the conclusion because it supports my deepest values, it is also a very strong claim, thus requiring strong scrutiny.

I believe this fits in politics, because, if true, this conclusion must still become politically accepted to be realized.

Article highlights:

As ecological breakdown looms, the basic material needs of billions remain unmet. We estimate the minimal energy for providing decent living globally & universally. Despite population growth, 2050 global energy use could be reduced to 1960 levels. This requires advanced technologies & reductions in demand to sufficiency levels. But ‘sufficiency’ is far more materially generous than many opponents often assume.

 

https://www.jphilll.com/p/deny-deflect-distract

A trenchant analysis of the reactions appearing across the political spectra. Written from an anti-capitalist perspective.

view more: next ›