I think on order for this to happen, we (the collective we) would need to donate far more than current levels.
I want it. Where I'm at, it's over 100f for quite a bit of the year. A nice bike area would be awesome.
Opencobol or gnucobol is good. You vmcam install it on any Debian based system no issues.
COBOL isn't hard to read, it's just hard to understand why someone made that decision. Context is key.
2 was exceptionally good. It fixed a lot of the bad fights/progression/story issues. I had a good time with it. Much better than 1.
Honestly as a dev, I just don't give a fuck. Is that a licence? MIT is close enough.
I let people pr and if it breaks something, oh well. It's not attached to my real name anyway. A good ci/cd saves time and mental energy so I don't have to publish and test. If I bother.
There's some things like onionos that I've helped out with thst I actually take pride in. But it's all for fun. Why not, it's my time. Code will come and go, but I left things a tiny bit better for all y'all.
That's what I do 😁. No real names unless it's something I don't care about.
I only support a couple of pip/composer/ect...and others package it up for any specific is or implementation. I always tell people "I will accept new prs" but if say I'm on vacation, I just don't look at the package. If it's bad enough, someone can fork and everyone else can move on with their lives. Hasn't happened yet on the couple of packages that got popular (?) but it's the lifecycle of open source.
Ive had a good time with PoPOS. Works well with Steam for instance.
thats a name I haven't heard in years! Oh wow blast from the past.
Theres a LOT of emulators that got caught in all that not just the ones that were taken down for legal reasons. Theres a reason quite a few new emulators are not on Github/public git sites anymore.
Im not saying your wrong, what I am saying is that the situation is a bit nuanced and if a PSX emulator wants to push their "rights" they might find they actually dont have any when push comes to shove.
Nice!!