Only the 14% statistic was explicitly about IPTV, the others are about "consuming content illegally". It seems like maybe there are multiple surveys involved?
melmi
joined 2 years ago
Only giving a /64 breaks stuff, but some ISPs do it anyway. With only a /64 you can't subnet your network at all.
Giving a /48 is spec, but a lot of ISPs are too stingy :/
Going to other planets would require a total re-architecting of our communications infrastructure anyway. There's such distance too it's not really viable to have a shared internet. Even Mars would have up to 22 minute latency at peak. So I don't think it makes sense to plan our current internet around potential future space colonization.
Even so, IPv6 is truly massive. We could give a /64 to every square centimeter of the Earth's surface and still have IPs to spare. Frankly, I think the protocol itself will be obsolete before we run out.
"You wouldn't download a car" is a meme edit that got stuck in everyone's heads. The original PSA actually does say "you wouldn't steal a car" and basically was what you describe in your last paragraph.
All of your temporary privacy addresses will be coming out of the same subnet, so it's clear they all belong to the same people.
Ultimately the privacy extensions are just bringing IPv6's privacy back in line with IPv4, because without the privacy extensions every single device has a separate IPv6 address based on its MAC address whereas in IPv4 most consumer networks have every device sharing a single IP.
What does "woke" mean? What makes modern Trek woke but old Trek not?
I think the utility of blocking people on a public platform is kind of fake anyway. If someone is harassing you, and you block them, it's obvious that you did it so they'll just log out and suddenly they can see your posts again. Accounts are trivial to make on the fediverse too so they can always just spin up a new one to harass you.
I think silent filtering is better for that reason because they can't tell that you did it so they won't just immediately switch to a new account and keep going.
Active blocking like you're talking about only makes sense if there's such a thing as "follower-only" posts imo. Otherwise it's a false sense of security because they can see everything anyway just by logging out or switching to another account.
Do you have a link to people talking about running a relay on a raspberry pi? I find it hard to believe that's possible. A PDS, sure, but a relay requires multiple terabytes of storage alone and plenty of bandwidth/CPU/RAM that I just don't see a raspberry pi being able to support.
I'd be curious to hear about any progress on setting up new relays though.
The free version of ChatGPT is 4o or 4.1-mini at this point. You can't even access 3.5 without paying, ironically, since it's legacy now.
CGNAT is for IPv4, the IPv6 network is separate. But if you have IPv6 connectivity on both ends setting up WG is the same as with IPv4.